* Joachim Eastwood manab...@gmail.com [140511 10:28]:
On 9 May 2014 18:07, Tony Lindgren t...@atomide.com wrote:
I was thinking that too initially, but then we would have macros that behave
in a different way:
1. Calculate the iopad offset from the iopad register area start based on
On 12 May 2014 18:16, Tony Lindgren t...@atomide.com wrote:
* Joachim Eastwood manab...@gmail.com [140511 10:28]:
On 9 May 2014 18:07, Tony Lindgren t...@atomide.com wrote:
I was thinking that too initially, but then we would have macros that
behave
in a different way:
1. Calculate
* Joachim Eastwood manab...@gmail.com [140512 09:27]:
So you are okey with just OMAP4_IOPAD for both core and wkup pads?
Well if we ever wanted to add range checking, the macro would have
to have size of the iopad range in it too. But that's probably
out of the scope for these macros anyways
On 9 May 2014 18:07, Tony Lindgren t...@atomide.com wrote:
* Joachim Eastwood manab...@gmail.com [140509 05:58]:
On 6 May 2014 02:12, Tony Lindgren t...@atomide.com wrote:
OK sorry just noticed you're using it already while was about to
apply your patches. Care to update that series again
On 6 May 2014 02:12, Tony Lindgren t...@atomide.com wrote:
Hi,
Sorry for dropping the ball on this one, got distracted with various
other fixes for a while.
* Joachim Eastwood manab...@gmail.com [140421 09:16]:
On 21 April 2014 18:12, Joachim Eastwood manab...@gmail.com wrote:
On 21
* Joachim Eastwood manab...@gmail.com [140509 05:58]:
On 6 May 2014 02:12, Tony Lindgren t...@atomide.com wrote:
OK sorry just noticed you're using it already while was about to
apply your patches. Care to update that series again to not use the
macro, or by adding the offsets?
hm, I'd
Hi,
Sorry for dropping the ball on this one, got distracted with various
other fixes for a while.
* Joachim Eastwood manab...@gmail.com [140421 09:16]:
On 21 April 2014 18:12, Joachim Eastwood manab...@gmail.com wrote:
On 21 April 2014 17:35, Tony Lindgren t...@atomide.com wrote:
* Joachim
* Joachim Eastwood manab...@gmail.com [140419 09:25]:
On 19 April 2014 18:14, Joachim Eastwood manab...@gmail.com wrote:
This was introduced in 43a348ea53eb5fd79 but hasn't caused
any harm since it don't have any users yet.
Or maybe I am confused about this macro.
Tony which offset from
On 21 April 2014 17:35, Tony Lindgren t...@atomide.com wrote:
* Joachim Eastwood manab...@gmail.com [140419 09:25]:
On 19 April 2014 18:14, Joachim Eastwood manab...@gmail.com wrote:
This was introduced in 43a348ea53eb5fd79 but hasn't caused
any harm since it don't have any users yet.
Or
On 21 April 2014 18:12, Joachim Eastwood manab...@gmail.com wrote:
On 21 April 2014 17:35, Tony Lindgren t...@atomide.com wrote:
* Joachim Eastwood manab...@gmail.com [140419 09:25]:
On 19 April 2014 18:14, Joachim Eastwood manab...@gmail.com wrote:
This was introduced in 43a348ea53eb5fd79
This was introduced in 43a348ea53eb5fd79 but hasn't caused
any harm since it don't have any users yet.
Signed-off-by: Joachim Eastwood manab...@gmail.com
---
Hello,
This one had me puzzled for a while. Wondering why USB
suddenly disappeared and suspecting by convert script.
-JE
On 19 April 2014 18:14, Joachim Eastwood manab...@gmail.com wrote:
This was introduced in 43a348ea53eb5fd79 but hasn't caused
any harm since it don't have any users yet.
Or maybe I am confused about this macro.
Tony which offset from the OMAP4 TRM should be used?
Under section 18.6.8 there
12 matches
Mail list logo
