On 19/03/13 10:28, Will Deacon wrote:
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 06:39:38AM +, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
On Monday 18 March 2013 10:36 PM, Will Deacon wrote:
Any chance you could follow up with your firmware/hardware guys about this
please? I'd really like to understand how we end up in this st
On Monday 25 March 2013 04:19 PM, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 09:11:00AM +, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
>> Will,
>
> Hi Santosh,
>
>> Are you going to send the patch for 3.9-rcx ? As I said before without the
>> patch OMAP4 CPUILDE is unusable because of that debug noise and hen
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 09:11:00AM +, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
> Will,
Hi Santosh,
> Are you going to send the patch for 3.9-rcx ? As I said before without the
> patch OMAP4 CPUILDE is unusable because of that debug noise and hence it
> will be good to get that patch in
It's in Russell's tre
Will,
On Tuesday 19 March 2013 03:58 PM, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 06:39:38AM +, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
>> On Monday 18 March 2013 10:36 PM, Will Deacon wrote:
[..]
>>> Well, we could just add the warn_once prints but that doesn't stop debug
>>> from breaking after the f
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 06:39:38AM +, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
> On Monday 18 March 2013 10:36 PM, Will Deacon wrote:
> > Any chance you could follow up with your firmware/hardware guys about this
> > please? I'd really like to understand how we end up in this state in case we
> > can do someth
On Monday 18 March 2013 10:36 PM, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 03:46:28PM +, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
>> On Monday 18 March 2013 08:37 PM, Will Deacon wrote:
>>> That really sucks :( Does this affect all OMAP-based boards?
>>>
>> All OMAP4 based boards..
>
> Brilliant. Is there
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 03:46:28PM +, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
> On Monday 18 March 2013 08:37 PM, Will Deacon wrote:
> > That really sucks :( Does this affect all OMAP-based boards?
> >
> All OMAP4 based boards..
Brilliant. Is there any way that the secure code can be fixed in future
product
On Monday 18 March 2013 08:37 PM, Will Deacon wrote:
> Hi Santosh,
>
> On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 06:51:30AM +, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
>> On Friday 15 March 2013 10:30 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
>>> Furthermore, I was under the impression that hw_breakpoint did actually
>>> work on panda, which imp
Hi Santosh,
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 06:51:30AM +, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
> On Friday 15 March 2013 10:30 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
> > Furthermore, I was under the impression that hw_breakpoint did actually
> > work on panda, which implies that a cold boot *does* manage to reset the
> > registe
On Friday 15 March 2013 10:30 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 01:08:00PM +0530, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
>> Will,
>
> Hi guys,
>
> I'm out of the office at the moment and have really terrible connectivity,
> so I can't do too much until next week. However, I don't think adding th
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 01:08:00PM +0530, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
> Will,
Hi guys,
I'm out of the office at the moment and have really terrible connectivity,
so I can't do too much until next week. However, I don't think adding the
has_ossr check is the right fix for this problem.
> On Wednesda
Lokesh Vutla writes:
> Commit {9a6eb31 ARM: hw_breakpoint: Debug powerdown support for self-hosted
> debug} introduces debug powerdown support for self-hosted debug.
> While merging the patch 'has_ossr' check was removed which
> was needed for hardwares which doesn't support self-hosted debug.
>
Will,
On Wednesday 13 March 2013 05:59 PM, Lokesh Vutla wrote:
> Hi Dietmar,
> On Wednesday 13 March 2013 05:35 PM, Dietmar Eggemann wrote:
>> On 13/03/13 06:52, Lokesh Vutla wrote:
>>> Commit {9a6eb31 ARM: hw_breakpoint: Debug powerdown support for
>>> self-hosted
>>> debug} introduces debug powe
Hi Dietmar,
On Wednesday 13 March 2013 05:35 PM, Dietmar Eggemann wrote:
On 13/03/13 06:52, Lokesh Vutla wrote:
Commit {9a6eb31 ARM: hw_breakpoint: Debug powerdown support for
self-hosted
debug} introduces debug powerdown support for self-hosted debug.
While merging the patch 'has_ossr' check wa
On 13/03/13 06:52, Lokesh Vutla wrote:
Commit {9a6eb31 ARM: hw_breakpoint: Debug powerdown support for self-hosted
debug} introduces debug powerdown support for self-hosted debug.
While merging the patch 'has_ossr' check was removed which
was needed for hardwares which doesn't support self-hosted
Commit {9a6eb31 ARM: hw_breakpoint: Debug powerdown support for self-hosted
debug} introduces debug powerdown support for self-hosted debug.
While merging the patch 'has_ossr' check was removed which
was needed for hardwares which doesn't support self-hosted debug.
Pandaboard (A9) is one such hardw
16 matches
Mail list logo
