On Thursday 14 March 2013 12:01 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
On Wed, 13 Mar 2013, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
On Wednesday 13 March 2013 07:49 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
Though making the rating of the dummy lower is definitely a good
thing, so a real hardware device which is detected later can
On Thu, 14 Mar 2013, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
On Wednesday 13 March 2013 09:48 PM, Mark Rutland wrote:
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 03:44:03PM +, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
On Wednesday 13 March 2013 05:55 PM, Mark Rutland wrote:
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 11:24:01AM +, Santosh Shilimkar
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 07:45:14AM +, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
On Wednesday 13 March 2013 09:48 PM, Mark Rutland wrote:
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 03:44:03PM +, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
On Wednesday 13 March 2013 05:55 PM, Mark Rutland wrote:
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 11:24:01AM +,
On 03/14/13 03:28, Mark Rutland wrote:
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 07:45:14AM +, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
On Wednesday 13 March 2013 09:48 PM, Mark Rutland wrote:
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 03:44:03PM +, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
On Wednesday 13 March 2013 05:55 PM, Mark Rutland wrote:
I do
With recent arm broadcast time clean-up from Mark Rutland, the dummy
broadcast device is always registered with timer subsystem. And since
the rating of the dummy clock event is very high, it is preferred
over a real broad-cast clock event.
This is a change in behavior from past and not an
(Forgot to CC Thomas)
On Wednesday 13 March 2013 02:36 PM, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
With recent arm broadcast time clean-up from Mark Rutland, the dummy
broadcast device is always registered with timer subsystem. And since
the rating of the dummy clock event is very high, it is preferred
over
Hi Santosh,
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 09:28:22AM +, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
(Forgot to CC Thomas)
On Wednesday 13 March 2013 02:36 PM, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
With recent arm broadcast time clean-up from Mark Rutland, the dummy
broadcast device is always registered with timer
On Wednesday 13 March 2013 03:46 PM, Mark Rutland wrote:
Hi Santosh,
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 09:28:22AM +, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
(Forgot to CC Thomas)
On Wednesday 13 March 2013 02:36 PM, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
With recent arm broadcast time clean-up from Mark Rutland, the dummy
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 11:24:01AM +, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
On Wednesday 13 March 2013 03:46 PM, Mark Rutland wrote:
Hi Santosh,
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 09:28:22AM +, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
(Forgot to CC Thomas)
On Wednesday 13 March 2013 02:36 PM, Santosh Shilimkar
On Wed, 13 Mar 2013, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
On Wednesday 13 March 2013 02:36 PM, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
With recent arm broadcast time clean-up from Mark Rutland, the dummy
broadcast device is always registered with timer subsystem. And since
the rating of the dummy clock event is very
On Wednesday 13 March 2013 07:49 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
On Wed, 13 Mar 2013, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
On Wednesday 13 March 2013 02:36 PM, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
With recent arm broadcast time clean-up from Mark Rutland, the dummy
broadcast device is always registered with timer
On Wednesday 13 March 2013 05:55 PM, Mark Rutland wrote:
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 11:24:01AM +, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
On Wednesday 13 March 2013 03:46 PM, Mark Rutland wrote:
Hi Santosh,
[..]
Is the problem that the dummy timer is being registered as the broadcast
source, or that it
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 03:44:03PM +, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
On Wednesday 13 March 2013 05:55 PM, Mark Rutland wrote:
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 11:24:01AM +, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
On Wednesday 13 March 2013 03:46 PM, Mark Rutland wrote:
Hi Santosh,
[..]
Is the problem
On Wed, 13 Mar 2013, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
On Wednesday 13 March 2013 07:49 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
Though making the rating of the dummy lower is definitely a good
thing, so a real hardware device which is detected later can replace
the dummy device. So yes, the rating should be low
14 matches
Mail list logo
