On Mon, 2010-02-01 at 21:00 +0100, ext Menon, Nishanth wrote:
> Ameya Palande said the following on 02/01/2010 07:56 PM:
> > Since vfree() checks for null pointer, there is no need to check is again in
> > MEM_VFree(). This patch also reorganizes the function to make it more
> > readable.
> >
> >
Ameya Palande said the following on 02/01/2010 07:56 PM:
Since vfree() checks for null pointer, there is no need to check is again in
MEM_VFree(). This patch also reorganizes the function to make it more readable.
Signed-off-by: Ameya Palande
---
drivers/dsp/bridge/services/mem.c | 42 ++
Since vfree() checks for null pointer, there is no need to check is again in
MEM_VFree(). This patch also reorganizes the function to make it more readable.
Signed-off-by: Ameya Palande
---
drivers/dsp/bridge/services/mem.c | 42 +++--
1 files changed, 17 insert