Re: [PATCH] Don't mark shared helper functions as inline

2013-01-11 Thread Mike Turquette
Quoting Russ Dill (2012-11-27 09:52:50) On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 11:57 AM, Mike Turquette mturque...@ti.com wrote: Quoting Russ Dill (2012-11-26 11:20:09) The helper functions that access the opaque struct clk should not be marked inline since they are contained in clk.c, but expected

Re: [PATCH] Don't mark shared helper functions as inline

2012-11-27 Thread Russ Dill
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 11:57 AM, Mike Turquette mturque...@ti.com wrote: Quoting Russ Dill (2012-11-26 11:20:09) The helper functions that access the opaque struct clk should not be marked inline since they are contained in clk.c, but expected to be used by other compilation units. This

[PATCH] Don't mark shared helper functions as inline

2012-11-26 Thread Russ Dill
The helper functions that access the opaque struct clk should not be marked inline since they are contained in clk.c, but expected to be used by other compilation units. This causes compile errors under gcc-4.7 In file included from arch/arm/mach-omap2/clockdomain.c:25:0:

Re: [PATCH] Don't mark shared helper functions as inline

2012-11-26 Thread Mike Turquette
Quoting Russ Dill (2012-11-26 11:20:09) The helper functions that access the opaque struct clk should not be marked inline since they are contained in clk.c, but expected to be used by other compilation units. This causes compile errors under gcc-4.7 In file included from

Re: [PATCH] Don't mark shared helper functions as inline

2012-11-26 Thread Mark A. Greer
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 11:57:42AM -0800, Mike Turquette wrote: Quoting Russ Dill (2012-11-26 11:20:09) The helper functions that access the opaque struct clk should not be marked inline since they are contained in clk.c, but expected to be used by other compilation units. This causes