On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 04:38:24PM -0700, Shilimkar, Santosh wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 4:09 PM, Aaro Koskinen wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 07:19:38AM -0700, Shilimkar, Santosh wrote:
> >> Or the PPA has resized the secure area of 16K. As you have seen the issue
> >> on one OMAP3 devic
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 4:09 PM, Aaro Koskinen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 07:19:38AM -0700, Shilimkar, Santosh wrote:
>> Or the PPA has resized the secure area of 16K. As you have seen the issue
>> on one OMAP3 device, it makes sense to takeout that 16K from the public
>> SRAM map.
>
Hi,
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 07:19:38AM -0700, Shilimkar, Santosh wrote:
> Or the PPA has resized the secure area of 16K. As you have seen the issue
> on one OMAP3 device, it makes sense to takeout that 16K from the public
> SRAM map.
>
> Can you send the patch with fixed base address fir PUB SRAM
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 5:20 AM, Aaro Koskinen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 05:17:30PM -0700, Shilimkar, Santosh wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 4:26 PM, Aaro Koskinen wrote:
>> > I tried bypassing the whole SRAM init, but the device does not seem to
>> > boot up at all.
>> >
>> > I
Hi,
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 05:17:30PM -0700, Shilimkar, Santosh wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 4:26 PM, Aaro Koskinen wrote:
> > I tried bypassing the whole SRAM init, but the device does not seem to
> > boot up at all.
> >
> > If I comment out the memset alone, then it boots and the issue is
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 4:26 PM, Aaro Koskinen wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 03:12:07PM -0700, Shilimkar, Santosh wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 3:02 PM, Aaro Koskinen wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 02:35:57PM -0700, Shilimkar, Santosh wrote:
>> >> > - pr_err("%s se
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 03:12:07PM -0700, Shilimkar, Santosh wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 3:02 PM, Aaro Koskinen wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 02:35:57PM -0700, Shilimkar, Santosh wrote:
> >> > - pr_err("%s seen by %s %s at address %x\n",
> >> > + pr_err_ratelimite
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 3:02 PM, Aaro Koskinen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 02:35:57PM -0700, Shilimkar, Santosh wrote:
>> > - pr_err("%s seen by %s %s at address %x\n",
>> > + pr_err_ratelimited("%s seen by %s %s at address %x\n",
>> > omap3_l3_code
Hi,
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 02:35:57PM -0700, Shilimkar, Santosh wrote:
> > - pr_err("%s seen by %s %s at address %x\n",
> > + pr_err_ratelimited("%s seen by %s %s at address %x\n",
> > omap3_l3_code_string(code),
> > omap3_l3_initiator_s
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 2:03 PM, Aaro Koskinen wrote:
>
> When booting kernel on RM-680/N950, the console is flooded with:
>
> [6.894348] In-band Error seen by MPU at address 0
> [6.894348] [ cut here ]
> [6.894378] WARNING: at arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_l3_smx.c
When booting kernel on RM-680/N950, the console is flooded with:
[6.894348] In-band Error seen by MPU at address 0
[6.894348] [ cut here ]
[6.894378] WARNING: at arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_l3_smx.c:162
omap3_l3_app_irq+0xd4/0x12c()
[6.894378] Modules linked
11 matches
Mail list logo
