resend because little format issue.
From fc5e771b808b5bf094846051a1c59c7e5e8ec149 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: janboe janboe...@gmail.com
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 13:50:57 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] flush the function in sdram is not correct because
sram is changed.
Signed-off-by: janboe
Hello janboe,
On Fri, 28 Aug 2009, ye janboe wrote:
From f10090bf307066f1317d7152c6f9a6f395007d4a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: janboe janboe...@gmail.com
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 13:50:57 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] flush the function in sdram is not correct because
sram is changed.
Hi, Paul
I resent the patch after fix the format issue.
Please help to review it.
Thanks
Janboe
2009/8/28 Paul Walmsley p...@pwsan.com:
Hello janboe,
On Fri, 28 Aug 2009, ye janboe wrote:
From f10090bf307066f1317d7152c6f9a6f395007d4a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: janboe
Hi Janboe,
On Fri, 28 Aug 2009, ye janboe wrote:
Hi, Paul
I resent the patch after fix the format issue.
Please help to review it.
Thanks, you fixed one issue, but this other one still needs to be fixed:
Your subject line should start with something like [PATCH] OMAP SRAM:,
and you
From f10090bf307066f1317d7152c6f9a6f395007d4a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: janboe janboe...@gmail.com
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 13:50:57 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] flush the function in sdram is not correct because
sram is changed.
Signed-off-by: janboe janboe...@gmail.com
---
