* Kwangwoo Lee wrote:
> On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 3:45 PM, Thierry Reding
> wrote:
> > * Kwangwoo Lee wrote:
> > [...]
> >> Thanks for the patch. It looks good. :)
> >> The code in the patch is already merged in the main kernel tree.
> >>
> >> @@ -235,7 +245,7 @@ static irqreturn_t tsc2007_irq(int ir
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 3:45 PM, Thierry Reding
wrote:
> * Kwangwoo Lee wrote:
> [...]
>> Thanks for the patch. It looks good. :)
>> The code in the patch is already merged in the main kernel tree.
>>
>> @@ -235,7 +245,7 @@ static irqreturn_t tsc2007_irq(int irq, void *handle)
>> spin_lock_ir
* Kwangwoo Lee wrote:
[...]
> Thanks for the patch. It looks good. :)
> The code in the patch is already merged in the main kernel tree.
>
> @@ -235,7 +245,7 @@ static irqreturn_t tsc2007_irq(int irq, void *handle)
> spin_lock_irqsave(&ts->lock, flags);
>
> if (likely(ts->get_pendown_
Hi,
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 2:21 AM, Trilok Soni wrote:
> Hi Therry,
>
> On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 8:27 PM, Thierry Reding
> wrote:
>> * Trilok Soni wrote:
>>> Hi Thierry,
>>>
>>> On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 5:07 PM, Thierry Reding
>>> wrote:
>>> > * Kwangwoo Lee wrote:
>>> >> Hi Thierry and Trilok,
>>>
Hi Thierry,
On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 11:57 PM, Thierry Reding
wrote:
> * Trilok Soni wrote:
>> Hi Thierry,
>>
>> On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 5:07 PM, Thierry Reding
>> wrote:
>> > * Kwangwoo Lee wrote:
>> >> Hi Thierry and Trilok,
>> >>
>> >> On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 10:23 PM, Trilok Soni
>> >> wrote:
* Trilok Soni wrote:
> Hi Therry,
>
> On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 8:27 PM, Thierry Reding
> wrote:
> > * Trilok Soni wrote:
> >> Hi Thierry,
> >>
> >> On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 5:07 PM, Thierry Reding
> >> wrote:
> >> > * Kwangwoo Lee wrote:
> >> >> Hi Thierry and Trilok,
> >> >>
> >> >> On Wed, Apr 29,
Hi Therry,
On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 8:27 PM, Thierry Reding
wrote:
> * Trilok Soni wrote:
>> Hi Thierry,
>>
>> On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 5:07 PM, Thierry Reding
>> wrote:
>> > * Kwangwoo Lee wrote:
>> >> Hi Thierry and Trilok,
>> >>
>> >> On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 10:23 PM, Trilok Soni
>> >> wrote:
>
* Trilok Soni wrote:
> Hi Thierry,
>
> On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 5:07 PM, Thierry Reding
> wrote:
> > * Kwangwoo Lee wrote:
> >> Hi Thierry and Trilok,
> >>
> >> On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 10:23 PM, Trilok Soni
> >> wrote:
> >> > Hi Thierry,
> >> >
> >> > I have added linux-omap community. How differ
Hi Thierry,
On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 5:07 PM, Thierry Reding
wrote:
> * Kwangwoo Lee wrote:
>> Hi Thierry and Trilok,
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 10:23 PM, Trilok Soni wrote:
>> > Hi Thierry,
>> >
>> > I have added linux-omap community. How different is this chip from
>> > tsc2007. It looks to m
* Kwangwoo Lee wrote:
> Hi Thierry and Trilok,
>
> On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 10:23 PM, Trilok Soni wrote:
> > Hi Thierry,
> >
> > I have added linux-omap community. How different is this chip from
> > tsc2007. It looks to me that this chip is not much different from
> > tsc2007 (this is just quick
Hi Thierry and Trilok,
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 10:23 PM, Trilok Soni wrote:
> Hi Thierry,
>
> I have added linux-omap community. How different is this chip from
> tsc2007. It looks to me that this chip is not much different from
> tsc2007 (this is just quick look at the driver). If they
> are sim
Hi Thierry,
I have added linux-omap community. How different is this chip from
tsc2007. It looks to me that this chip is not much different from
tsc2007 (this is just quick look at the driver). If they
are similar please consider using i2c_device_id feature in tsc2007 to
accommodate this chip.
--
12 matches
Mail list logo