Hi Kevin,
On Fri, May 04, 2012 at 03:02:16, Hilman, Kevin wrote:
Ben Hutchings bhutchi...@solarflare.com writes:
On Thu, 2012-05-03 at 19:25 +, Bedia, Vaibhav wrote:
On Fri, May 04, 2012 at 00:16:32, Mark A. Greer wrote:
[...]
So, if I understood this correctly, it's
+Sekhar
Bedia, Vaibhav vaibhav.be...@ti.com writes:
Hi Kevin,
On Fri, May 04, 2012 at 03:02:16, Hilman, Kevin wrote:
Ben Hutchings bhutchi...@solarflare.com writes:
On Thu, 2012-05-03 at 19:25 +, Bedia, Vaibhav wrote:
On Fri, May 04, 2012 at 00:16:32, Mark A. Greer wrote:
[...]
On Fri, May 04, 2012 at 01:55:58PM +, Bedia, Vaibhav wrote:
Hi Vaibhav.
Hi Kevin,
On Fri, May 04, 2012 at 03:02:16, Hilman, Kevin wrote:
Ben Hutchings bhutchi...@solarflare.com writes:
On Thu, 2012-05-03 at 19:25 +, Bedia, Vaibhav wrote:
On Fri, May 04, 2012 at 00:16:32,
Hi Mark,
Mark A. Greer mgr...@animalcreek.com writes:
[...]
To work around this issue, add platform data callbacks which
are called at the beginning of the open routine and at the
end of the stop routine of the davinci_emac driver. The
callbacks allow the platform code to issue
On Fri, May 04, 2012 at 07:31:30AM -0700, Kevin Hilman wrote:
Bedia, Vaibhav vaibhav.be...@ti.com writes:
Hi Kevin.
If it does, perhaps there should some other mechanism for letting
users control the system behavior.
Come to think of it, the right solution here is probably to use runtime
On Fri, May 04, 2012 at 09:44:45AM -0700, Kevin Hilman wrote:
Hi Mark,
Hi Kevin.
Mark A. Greer mgr...@animalcreek.com writes:
[...]
To work around this issue, add platform data callbacks which
are called at the beginning of the open routine and at the
end of the stop routine of the
Mark A. Greer mgr...@animalcreek.com writes:
On Fri, May 04, 2012 at 07:31:30AM -0700, Kevin Hilman wrote:
[...]
Come to think of it, the right solution here is probably to use runtime
PM. We could then to add some custom hooks for davinci_emac in the
device code to use
On Fri, May 04, 2012 at 02:02:43PM -0700, Kevin Hilman wrote:
Mark A. Greer mgr...@animalcreek.com writes:
On Fri, May 04, 2012 at 07:31:30AM -0700, Kevin Hilman wrote:
[...]
Come to think of it, the right solution here is probably to use runtime
PM. We could then to add some custom
On Thu, May 03, 2012 at 05:17:18, Mark A. Greer wrote:
From: Mark A. Greer mgr...@animalcreek.com
The davinci EMAC driver has been incorporated into the am35x
family of SoC's which is OMAP-based. The incorporation is
incomplete in that the EMAC cannot unblock the [ARM] core if
its blocked
Bedia, Vaibhav vaibhav.be...@ti.com writes:
On Thu, May 03, 2012 at 05:17:18, Mark A. Greer wrote:
From: Mark A. Greer mgr...@animalcreek.com
The davinci EMAC driver has been incorporated into the am35x
family of SoC's which is OMAP-based. The incorporation is
incomplete in that the EMAC
On Thu, May 03, 2012 at 10:44:44AM +, Bedia, Vaibhav wrote:
On Thu, May 03, 2012 at 05:17:18, Mark A. Greer wrote:
From: Mark A. Greer mgr...@animalcreek.com
The davinci EMAC driver has been incorporated into the am35x
family of SoC's which is OMAP-based. The incorporation is
On Thu, May 03, 2012 at 21:39:18, Mark A. Greer wrote:
On Thu, May 03, 2012 at 10:44:44AM +, Bedia, Vaibhav wrote:
On Thu, May 03, 2012 at 05:17:18, Mark A. Greer wrote:
From: Mark A. Greer mgr...@animalcreek.com
The davinci EMAC driver has been incorporated into the am35x
On Thu, May 03, 2012 at 06:21:27PM +, Bedia, Vaibhav wrote:
On Thu, May 03, 2012 at 21:39:18, Mark A. Greer wrote:
On Thu, May 03, 2012 at 10:44:44AM +, Bedia, Vaibhav wrote:
On Thu, May 03, 2012 at 05:17:18, Mark A. Greer wrote:
From: Mark A. Greer mgr...@animalcreek.com
On Fri, May 04, 2012 at 00:16:32, Mark A. Greer wrote:
[...]
So, if I understood this correctly, it's effectively like blocking a low
power
state transition (here wfi execution) when EMAC is active?
Assuming it is my patch, correct.
Recently I was thinking about how to get certain
On Thu, 2012-05-03 at 19:25 +, Bedia, Vaibhav wrote:
On Fri, May 04, 2012 at 00:16:32, Mark A. Greer wrote:
[...]
So, if I understood this correctly, it's effectively like blocking a low
power
state transition (here wfi execution) when EMAC is active?
Assuming it is my
From: Mark A. Greer mgr...@animalcreek.com
The davinci EMAC driver has been incorporated into the am35x
family of SoC's which is OMAP-based. The incorporation is
incomplete in that the EMAC cannot unblock the [ARM] core if
its blocked on a 'wfi' instruction. This is an issue with
the cpu_idle
16 matches
Mail list logo
