On Wed, 2010-10-06 at 17:55 +0200, ext Luciano Coelho wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-10-06 at 17:30 +0200, ext John W. Linville wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 06, 2010 at 06:27:49PM +0300, Luciano Coelho wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2010-10-06 at 16:01 +0200, ext Gadiyar, Anand wrote:
> > > > >> Hmmm... We got a problem he
On Wed, 2010-10-06 at 17:30 +0200, ext John W. Linville wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 06, 2010 at 06:27:49PM +0300, Luciano Coelho wrote:
> > On Wed, 2010-10-06 at 16:01 +0200, ext Gadiyar, Anand wrote:
> > > >> Hmmm... We got a problem here. This patch breaks builds when we
> > > >> *don't*
> > > >> have
On Wed, Oct 06, 2010 at 06:27:49PM +0300, Luciano Coelho wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-10-06 at 16:01 +0200, ext Gadiyar, Anand wrote:
> > >> Hmmm... We got a problem here. This patch breaks builds when we *don't*
> > >> have "omap: mmc extended to pass host capabilities from board file". We
> > >> don't
On Wed, 2010-10-06 at 16:01 +0200, ext Gadiyar, Anand wrote:
> >> Hmmm... We got a problem here. This patch breaks builds when we *don't*
> >> have "omap: mmc extended to pass host capabilities from board file". We
> >> don't have that on wireless-next yet, so builds with zoom boards
> >> selecte
>> Hmmm... We got a problem here. This patch breaks builds when we *don't*
>> have "omap: mmc extended to pass host capabilities from board file". We
>> don't have that on wireless-next yet, so builds with zoom boards
>> selected are broken.
>>
>> Any ideas on how to solve this dilemma? I guess t
On Tue, Oct 05, 2010 at 11:39:47PM +0300, Luciano Coelho wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-10-05 at 15:19 +0200, ext Luciano Coelho wrote:
> > On Tue, 2010-10-05 at 14:07 +0200, ext Luciano Coelho wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2010-10-05 at 13:53 +0200, ext Luciano Coelho wrote:
> > > > On Sat, 2010-10-02 at 01:10 +020
On Tue, 2010-10-05 at 15:19 +0200, ext Luciano Coelho wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-10-05 at 14:07 +0200, ext Luciano Coelho wrote:
> > On Tue, 2010-10-05 at 13:53 +0200, ext Luciano Coelho wrote:
> > > On Sat, 2010-10-02 at 01:10 +0200, ext Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > > > * Anand Gadiyar [101001 13:25]:
> >
On Tue, 2010-10-05 at 14:07 +0200, ext Luciano Coelho wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-10-05 at 13:53 +0200, ext Luciano Coelho wrote:
> > On Sat, 2010-10-02 at 01:10 +0200, ext Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > > * Anand Gadiyar [101001 13:25]:
> > > > Patch "omap: zoom: add mmc3/wl1271 device support" in the
> > >
On Tue, 2010-10-05 at 13:53 +0200, ext Luciano Coelho wrote:
> On Sat, 2010-10-02 at 01:10 +0200, ext Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > * Anand Gadiyar [101001 13:25]:
> > > Patch "omap: zoom: add mmc3/wl1271 device support" in the
> > > wireless tree still uses .wires in struct omap2_hsmmc_info.
> > > .wi
On Sat, 2010-10-02 at 01:10 +0200, ext Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Anand Gadiyar [101001 13:25]:
> > Patch "omap: zoom: add mmc3/wl1271 device support" in the
> > wireless tree still uses .wires in struct omap2_hsmmc_info.
> > .wires has now been replaced with .caps in patch "omap: mmc:
> > extended
* Anand Gadiyar [101001 13:25]:
> Patch "omap: zoom: add mmc3/wl1271 device support" in the
> wireless tree still uses .wires in struct omap2_hsmmc_info.
> .wires has now been replaced with .caps in patch "omap: mmc:
> extended to pass host capabilities from board file" in the
> OMAP tree.
>
> Th
Patch "omap: zoom: add mmc3/wl1271 device support" in the
wireless tree still uses .wires in struct omap2_hsmmc_info.
.wires has now been replaced with .caps in patch "omap: mmc:
extended to pass host capabilities from board file" in the
OMAP tree.
This causes linux-next as of 20101001 build to br
12 matches
Mail list logo
