* Sekhar Nori nsek...@ti.com [130916 05:33]:
On Friday 13 September 2013 09:07 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
* Sekhar Nori nsek...@ti.com [130913 03:18]:
Get rid of TI specific binding ti,non-removable in favour of the
generic binding present for the same purpose.
Looks like there's a
On Friday 13 September 2013 09:07 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
* Sekhar Nori nsek...@ti.com [130913 03:18]:
Get rid of TI specific binding ti,non-removable in favour of the
generic binding present for the same purpose.
Looks like there's a different handling in the MMC driver
for
On Saturday 14 September 2013 03:37 AM, Balaji T K wrote:
On Friday 13 September 2013 09:07 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
* Sekhar Nori nsek...@ti.com [130913 03:18]:
Get rid of TI specific binding ti,non-removable in favour of the
generic binding present for the same purpose.
Looks like there's
Get rid of TI specific binding ti,non-removable in favour of the
generic binding present for the same purpose.
This patch set does not support the old binding anymore. So, yes,
it does introduce an ABI breakage. IMHO, it is not really worth
supporting both bindings ATM since DT-usage in OMAP is
* Sekhar Nori nsek...@ti.com [130913 03:18]:
Get rid of TI specific binding ti,non-removable in favour of the
generic binding present for the same purpose.
Looks like there's a different handling in the MMC driver
for no_regulator_off_init that's needed for eMMC. That needs to
be sorted out and
On Friday 13 September 2013 09:07 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
* Sekhar Nori nsek...@ti.com [130913 03:18]:
Get rid of TI specific binding ti,non-removable in favour of the
generic binding present for the same purpose.
Looks like there's a different handling in the MMC driver
for
