Re: [PATCH 0/5] extra module resets to ensure full-chip idle

2008-11-30 Thread Paul Walmsley
On Sat, 29 Nov 2008, Kevin Hilman wrote: This series applies on top of on addtional patch which I mistakenly assumed was already in l-o. Here it is. Just FYI, there's an updated version of this patch - following shortly... - Paul -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe

Re: [PATCH 0/5] extra module resets to ensure full-chip idle

2008-11-29 Thread Kevin Hilman
Koen Kooi [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Op 27 nov 2008, om 01:05 heeft Kevin Hilman het volgende geschreven: Various bootloaders have been known to leave modules in a state which prevents full-chip retention. This series forces MMC, IVA2 and D2D/modem into known reset/idle states so that the

Re: [PATCH 0/5] extra module resets to ensure full-chip idle

2008-11-27 Thread Koen Kooi
Op 27 nov 2008, om 01:05 heeft Kevin Hilman het volgende geschreven: Various bootloaders have been known to leave modules in a state which prevents full-chip retention. This series forces MMC, IVA2 and D2D/modem into known reset/idle states so that the OMAP3 can hit full-chip idle. Tested on

Re: [PATCH 0/5] extra module resets to ensure full-chip idle

2008-11-26 Thread Kevin Hilman
Dirk Behme [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Kevin Hilman wrote: Various bootloaders have been known to leave modules in a state which prevents full-chip retention. Does it make sense to check if [PATCH 1/5] OMAP3: PM: HSMMC: force MMC module reset on boot [PATCH 2/5] OMAP3: PM: Force IVA2 into