Felipe
>
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 02:43:00PM +0200, Daniel Mack wrote:
> > On 03.04.2013 14:04, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> > > On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 02:00:23PM +0200, Daniel Mack wrote:
> >
> > >> Felipe, could you explain the background on how the dsps driver is
> > >> supposed to work in
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 03:16:05PM +0200, Daniel Mack wrote:
> On 03.04.2013 15:12, Koen Kooi wrote:
> >
> > Op 3 apr. 2013, om 15:09 heeft Felipe Balbi het
> > volgende geschreven:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 02:43:00PM +0200, Daniel Mack wrote:
> >>> On 03.04.2013 14:0
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 03:12:11PM +0200, Koen Kooi wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 02:43:00PM +0200, Daniel Mack wrote:
> >> On 03.04.2013 14:04, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> >>> On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 02:00:23PM +0200, Daniel Mack wrote:
> >>
> Felipe, could you explain the background on
On 03.04.2013 15:12, Koen Kooi wrote:
>
> Op 3 apr. 2013, om 15:09 heeft Felipe Balbi het
> volgende geschreven:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 02:43:00PM +0200, Daniel Mack wrote:
>>> On 03.04.2013 14:04, Felipe Balbi wrote:
On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 02:00:23PM +0200, Daniel Mack wr
Op 3 apr. 2013, om 15:09 heeft Felipe Balbi het volgende
geschreven:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 02:43:00PM +0200, Daniel Mack wrote:
>> On 03.04.2013 14:04, Felipe Balbi wrote:
>>> On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 02:00:23PM +0200, Daniel Mack wrote:
>>
Felipe, could you explain the backgr
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 02:43:00PM +0200, Daniel Mack wrote:
> On 03.04.2013 14:04, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 02:00:23PM +0200, Daniel Mack wrote:
>
> >> Felipe, could you explain the background on how the dsps driver is
> >> supposed to work in host mode at boot time wi
On 03.04.2013 14:04, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 02:00:23PM +0200, Daniel Mack wrote:
>> Felipe, could you explain the background on how the dsps driver is
>> supposed to work in host mode at boot time with the rework of the driver
>> you did for 3.7? It might just be me not unde
Hi Felipe,
On 03.04.2013 14:04, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> (sorry, being really busy lately)
>
> On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 02:00:23PM +0200, Daniel Mack wrote:
>>> >> I know this patch reintroduces bits that have been intentionally
>>> >> removed before, in particular by 032ec49f53 ("usb: musb: drop
>
Hi,
(sorry, being really busy lately)
On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 02:00:23PM +0200, Daniel Mack wrote:
> > >> I know this patch reintroduces bits that have been intentionally
> > >> removed before, in particular by 032ec49f53 ("usb: musb: drop
> > >> useless board_mode usage"), but I don't know ho
On 19.03.2013 14:27, Peter Korsgaard wrote:
>> "Daniel" == Daniel Mack writes:
>
> Hi,
>
> >> I know this patch reintroduces bits that have been intentionally
> >> removed before, in particular by 032ec49f53 ("usb: musb: drop
> >> useless board_mode usage"), but I don't know how this usb
> "Daniel" == Daniel Mack writes:
Hi,
>> I know this patch reintroduces bits that have been intentionally
>> removed before, in particular by 032ec49f53 ("usb: musb: drop
>> useless board_mode usage"), but I don't know how this usb driver is
>> supposed to work in host mode without takin
On 08.03.2013 17:44, Daniel Mack wrote:
> On 07.03.2013 13:51, Daniel Mack wrote:
>> On 04.03.2013 00:53, Daniel Mack wrote:
>>> Hi Peter,
>>>
>>> On 03.03.2013 23:24, Peter Korsgaard wrote:
> "Daniel" == Daniel Mack writes:
Hi,
Daniel> On my board, the USB is purely u
On 07.03.2013 13:51, Daniel Mack wrote:
> On 04.03.2013 00:53, Daniel Mack wrote:
>> Hi Peter,
>>
>> On 03.03.2013 23:24, Peter Korsgaard wrote:
"Daniel" == Daniel Mack writes:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Daniel> On my board, the USB is purely used as host interface, with a
>>> Daniel> type B p
On 04.03.2013 00:53, Daniel Mack wrote:
> Hi Peter,
>
> On 03.03.2013 23:24, Peter Korsgaard wrote:
>>> "Daniel" == Daniel Mack writes:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Daniel> On my board, the USB is purely used as host interface, with a
>> Daniel> type B plug soldered. In the DT, I'm using the following
>
Hi Peter,
On 03.03.2013 23:24, Peter Korsgaard wrote:
>> "Daniel" == Daniel Mack writes:
>
> Hi,
>
> Daniel> On my board, the USB is purely used as host interface, with a
> Daniel> type B plug soldered. In the DT, I'm using the following
> Daniel> sniplet in accordance to the documentati
> "Daniel" == Daniel Mack writes:
Hi,
Daniel> On my board, the USB is purely used as host interface, with a
Daniel> type B plug soldered. In the DT, I'm using the following
Daniel> sniplet in accordance to the documentation of the bindings:
Daniel>usb_otg_hs: usb@4740 {
Dan
On 02.03.2013 17:05, Koen Kooi wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-03-01 at 22:57 +0100, Daniel Mack wrote:
>> Hi Afzal, everyone,
>>
>> On 03.11.2012 08:33, Mohammed, Afzal wrote:
>>> * Daniel Mack, November 03, 2012 1:06 AM:
>>>
I'm testing these patches with an AM33xx board that has the first musb
p
On Fri, 2013-03-01 at 22:57 +0100, Daniel Mack wrote:
> Hi Afzal, everyone,
>
> On 03.11.2012 08:33, Mohammed, Afzal wrote:
> > * Daniel Mack, November 03, 2012 1:06 AM:
> >
> >> I'm testing these patches with an AM33xx board that has the first musb
> >> port wired to an USB type A plug, but it d
On 01.03.2013 22:57, Daniel Mack wrote:
> Hi Afzal, everyone,
>
> On 03.11.2012 08:33, Mohammed, Afzal wrote:
>> * Daniel Mack, November 03, 2012 1:06 AM:
>>
>>> I'm testing these patches with an AM33xx board that has the first musb
>>> port wired to an USB type A plug, but it doesn't yet work for
Hi Afzal, everyone,
On 03.11.2012 08:33, Mohammed, Afzal wrote:
> * Daniel Mack, November 03, 2012 1:06 AM:
>
>> I'm testing these patches with an AM33xx board that has the first musb
>> port wired to an USB type A plug, but it doesn't yet work for me.
>
>> So there is no host interface register
Hi Daniel,
* Daniel Mack, November 03, 2012 1:06 AM:
> I'm testing these patches with an AM33xx board that has the first musb
> port wired to an USB type A plug, but it doesn't yet work for me.
> So there is no host interface registered. I'm unsure on how to fix this,
> and I didn't get an answe
>
> On 02.11.2012 17:31, Afzal Mohammed wrote:
> > This series adds usb support to am335x SoC's found on boards like
> > Beagle Bone. Here only first instance is supported, as currently
> > multiple phy's of same type is not supported (am335x has two USB2
> > phy's).
>
> I'm testing these patc
Hi Afzal,
On 02.11.2012 17:31, Afzal Mohammed wrote:
> This series adds usb support to am335x SoC's found on boards like
> Beagle Bone. Here only first instance is supported, as currently
> multiple phy's of same type is not supported (am335x has two USB2
> phy's).
I'm testing these patches with
Hi Balbi,
This series adds usb support to am335x SoC's found on boards like
Beagle Bone. Here only first instance is supported, as currently
multiple phy's of same type is not supported (am335x has two USB2
phy's).
This series is based on your musb branch,
(HEAD - 2f77116 usb: musb: remove hand-
24 matches
Mail list logo
