On Wednesday 21 September 2011, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 4:12 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>
> > My feeling is that it would be best for Ohad to send these directly
> > to Linus, since it's basically a standalone subsystem and he's listed
> > as the maintainer (well, after this
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 7:14 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> OK acked the related patch.
Thanks!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
* Ohad Ben-Cohen [110921 08:34]:
> On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 6:56 PM, Ohad Ben-Cohen wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 6:28 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> >> Ohad can you please try this first? Just please make sure your patches are
> >> first in next tree before sending in the pull request.
> >
> >
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 6:56 PM, Ohad Ben-Cohen wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 6:28 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
>> Ohad can you please try this first? Just please make sure your patches are
>> first in next tree before sending in the pull request.
>
> Sure thing.
>
> Stephen, I'll send you the loc
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 6:28 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> Ohad can you please try this first? Just please make sure your patches are
> first in next tree before sending in the pull request.
Sure thing.
Stephen, I'll send you the location of my tree in a few.
Thanks,
Ohad.
--
To unsubscribe from t
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 4:12 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> My feeling is that it would be best for Ohad to send these directly
> to Linus, since it's basically a standalone subsystem and he's listed
> as the maintainer (well, after this series at least).
I agree. That's the path of least resistance
* Arnd Bergmann [110921 06:39]:
> On Wednesday 21 September 2011, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > * Ohad Ben-Cohen [110920 01:34]:
> > > On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 7:46 PM, Ohad Ben-Cohen wrote:
> > >
> > > I'm wondering how hwspinlock updates like this should go upstream.
> > >
> > > The first hwspinlo
* Greg KH [110921 07:27]:
> On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 04:13:40PM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > * Ohad Ben-Cohen [110920 01:34]:
> > > On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 7:46 PM, Ohad Ben-Cohen wrote:
> > >
> > > I'm wondering how hwspinlock updates like this should go upstream.
> > >
> > > The first hwsp
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 04:13:40PM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Ohad Ben-Cohen [110920 01:34]:
> > On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 7:46 PM, Ohad Ben-Cohen wrote:
> >
> > I'm wondering how hwspinlock updates like this should go upstream.
> >
> > The first hwspinlock batch was picked by Tony, because
On Wednesday 21 September 2011, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Ohad Ben-Cohen [110920 01:34]:
> > On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 7:46 PM, Ohad Ben-Cohen wrote:
> >
> > I'm wondering how hwspinlock updates like this should go upstream.
> >
> > The first hwspinlock batch was picked by Tony, because it involve
* Ohad Ben-Cohen [110920 01:34]:
> On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 7:46 PM, Ohad Ben-Cohen wrote:
>
> I'm wondering how hwspinlock updates like this should go upstream.
>
> The first hwspinlock batch was picked by Tony, because it involved a
> bulk of OMAP changes.
>
> Hwspinlock isn't OMAP-specific a
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 7:46 PM, Ohad Ben-Cohen wrote:
> This series includes a new u8500 hwspinlock driver from Mathieu,
> a core fix from Juan and several other cleanups/fixes
> (some of which were reported by Arnd while reviewing Mathieu's
> driver).
...
> Documentation/hwspinlock.txt
This series includes a new u8500 hwspinlock driver from Mathieu,
a core fix from Juan and several other cleanups/fixes
(some of which were reported by Arnd while reviewing Mathieu's
driver).
Maybe the most notable core change is the move to registering
a bank of hwspinlocks in a single API call, r
13 matches
Mail list logo
