Hi Benoit,
Benoit Cousson b-cous...@ti.com writes:
[...]
This is not for pull-request, becasue it is based on irqdomain + OMAP
IRQ DT series + OMAP twl DT series yet to be pushed.
What's the status of this series?
At least 'gpio/twl: Allocate irq_desc dynamically for SPARSE_IRQ
support' is
Hi Kevin,
On 3/14/2012 9:50 PM, Kevin Hilman wrote:
Hi Benoit,
Benoit Coussonb-cous...@ti.com writes:
[...]
This is not for pull-request, becasue it is based on irqdomain + OMAP
IRQ DT series + OMAP twl DT series yet to be pushed.
What's the status of this series?
I sent earlier today
Cousson, Benoit b-cous...@ti.com writes:
Hi Kevin,
On 3/14/2012 9:50 PM, Kevin Hilman wrote:
Hi Benoit,
Benoit Coussonb-cous...@ti.com writes:
[...]
This is not for pull-request, becasue it is based on irqdomain + OMAP
IRQ DT series + OMAP twl DT series yet to be pushed.
What's the
Hi Samuel and Tony,
Here is a fix + cleanup + SPARSE_IRQ series for TWL4030 and TWL6030.
The first goal was to fix the current regression due to irqdomain
support inside twl-core for OMAP3 + twl4030.
The issue is that there is no quick and dirty fix for that, hence this
exhaustive series
