Re: [PATCH 07/14] cpufreq: cpu0: OPPs can be populated at runtime

2014-07-10 Thread Viresh Kumar
On 10 July 2014 19:01, Santosh Shilimkar wrote: > Yep. Last time I blocked the series because all the DT conversions > were not done. Considering now the cpufreq-generic can work on non > DT platforms, I am ok to remove the omap-cpufreq. Great. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "uns

Re: [PATCH 07/14] cpufreq: cpu0: OPPs can be populated at runtime

2014-07-10 Thread Santosh Shilimkar
On Thursday 10 July 2014 08:39 AM, Nishanth Menon wrote: > On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 6:19 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote: >> On 9 July 2014 20:14, Santosh Shilimkar wrote: >>> Assuming you are updating bidnings as suggested by Stephen, >>> patch looks good to me. >>> Acked-by: Santosh Shilimkar >> >> Why

Re: [PATCH 07/14] cpufreq: cpu0: OPPs can be populated at runtime

2014-07-10 Thread Nishanth Menon
On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 6:19 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 9 July 2014 20:14, Santosh Shilimkar wrote: >> Assuming you are updating bidnings as suggested by Stephen, >> patch looks good to me. >> Acked-by: Santosh Shilimkar > > Why do you still have a separate cpufreq driver for omap? > Would thi