On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 10:06:23AM +0300, Pantelis Antoniou wrote:
> Err,
>
> There was a patch been sent in response that did exactly as you asked.
>
> http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1205.3/00433.html
>
> Regards
Obviously it was missed, and no one bothered to re-send it. Yes,
Err,
There was a patch been sent in response that did exactly as you asked.
http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1205.3/00433.html
Regards
-- Pantelis
On Jun 24, 2012, at 11:59 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> See this thread:
>
> http://lists.arm.linux.org.uk/lurker/thread/20
On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 10:59 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux
wrote:
> See this thread:
>
> http://lists.arm.linux.org.uk/lurker/thread/20120523.200015.2fdfd505.en.html
>
> There are times when I wonder why I bother replying to email on mailing
> lists. No patch ever came from my responses on this s
See this thread:
http://lists.arm.linux.org.uk/lurker/thread/20120523.200015.2fdfd505.en.html
There are times when I wonder why I bother replying to email on mailing
lists. No patch ever came from my responses on this subject. Not going
to repeat it again. Fed up.
On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 06:2
On reboot or poweroff (machine_shutdown()) a call to smp_send_stop() is
made (to stop the others CPU's) when CONFIG_SMP=y.
arch/arm/kernel/process.c:
void machine_shutdown(void)
{
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
smp_send_stop();
#endif
}
smp_send_stop() calls the function pointer smp_cross_call(), wh
