On Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 11:56:06AM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Mark Brown [150901 11:40]:
> > That'd work. The other thing I was thinking we could do is to get
> > syscon to treat any excessively large address that gets passed in that
> > looks like an absolute address
* Mark Brown [150901 11:40]:
> On Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 07:17:21AM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote:
>
> > Why don't you just make reg unused for pbias_regulator since
> > we already use regmap for this driver?
>
> > Then in the pbias driver just define the register offset from
> >
On Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 07:17:21AM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> Why don't you just make reg unused for pbias_regulator since
> we already use regmap for this driver?
> Then in the pbias driver just define the register offset from
> the syscon base? You may need to set it based on the compatible
Hi Mark,
On Monday 31 August 2015 08:22 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 04:14:07PM +0530, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
>> On Tuesday 25 August 2015 07:20 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
>>> On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 01:03:04PM +0300, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
On 08/19/2015 09:11 PM, Mark
Now fixed Lee Jones mail address!
On Tuesday 01 September 2015 03:10 PM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
> Hi Mark,
>
> On Monday 31 August 2015 08:22 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 04:14:07PM +0530, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
>>> On Tuesday 25 August 2015 07:20 PM, Mark Brown
Hi,
I think the fix is rather easy here.. See below.
* Kishon Vijay Abraham I [150901 02:43]:
>
> Before commit d919501feffa8715147582c3ffce96fad0c7016f ARM: dts: dra7:
> add minimal l4 bus layout with control module support, the dt was like
>
> ocp {
> dra7_ctrl_general:
On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 04:14:07PM +0530, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
> On Tuesday 25 August 2015 07:20 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 01:03:04PM +0300, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
> >> On 08/19/2015 09:11 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> >>> So substract this address from the start of
Hi Mark,
On Tuesday 25 August 2015 07:20 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 01:03:04PM +0300, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
>> On 08/19/2015 09:11 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
>
>>> So substract this address from the start of the resource to get the
>>> offset? Or provide a wrapper function in
On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 01:03:04PM +0300, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
On 08/19/2015 09:11 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
So substract this address from the start of the resource to get the
offset? Or provide a wrapper function in the resource code which does
that.
I'd be very appreciated if you
Hi Mark,
On 08/19/2015 09:11 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 11:23:54AM +0530, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
On Friday 14 August 2015 11:30 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 04:54:09PM +0530, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
is moved as a child node of syscon, vsel_reg
On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 11:21:06AM +0530, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
On Wednesday 19 August 2015 11:41 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 11:23:54AM +0530, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
Please fix your mail client to word wrap within paragraphs.
platform_get_resource can be
On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 11:23:54AM +0530, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
On Friday 14 August 2015 11:30 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 04:54:09PM +0530, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
is moved as a child node of syscon, vsel_reg and enable_reg has the
absolute address because
Hi Mark Brown,
On Wednesday 19 August 2015 11:41 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 11:23:54AM +0530, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
On Friday 14 August 2015 11:30 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 04:54:09PM +0530, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
is moved as a child
Hi Mark Brown,
On Friday 14 August 2015 11:30 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 04:54:09PM +0530, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
vsel_reg and enable_reg of the pbias regulator descriptor should actually
have the offset from syscon. However after the pbias device tree node
I'm
On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 04:54:09PM +0530, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
vsel_reg and enable_reg of the pbias regulator descriptor should actually
have the offset from syscon. However after the pbias device tree node
I'm having a hard time understanding this statement, sorry. What makes
you
On 08/06/2015 09:26 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
* Kishon Vijay Abraham I kis...@ti.com [150805 07:59]:
Hi Tony,
On Wednesday 05 August 2015 03:17 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
* Kishon Vijay Abraham I kis...@ti.com [150727 04:27]:
vsel_reg and enable_reg of the pbias regulator descriptor should
* Kishon Vijay Abraham I kis...@ti.com [150805 07:59]:
Hi Tony,
On Wednesday 05 August 2015 03:17 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
* Kishon Vijay Abraham I kis...@ti.com [150727 04:27]:
vsel_reg and enable_reg of the pbias regulator descriptor should actually
have the offset from syscon. However
* Kishon Vijay Abraham I kis...@ti.com [150727 04:27]:
vsel_reg and enable_reg of the pbias regulator descriptor should actually
have the offset from syscon. However after the pbias device tree node
is moved as a child node of syscon, vsel_reg and enable_reg has the
absolute address because of
Hi Tony,
On Wednesday 05 August 2015 03:17 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
* Kishon Vijay Abraham I kis...@ti.com [150727 04:27]:
vsel_reg and enable_reg of the pbias regulator descriptor should actually
have the offset from syscon. However after the pbias device tree node
is moved as a child node
On 07/27/2015 02:24 PM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
vsel_reg and enable_reg of the pbias regulator descriptor should actually
have the offset from syscon. However after the pbias device tree node
is moved as a child node of syscon, vsel_reg and enable_reg has the
absolute address because of
vsel_reg and enable_reg of the pbias regulator descriptor should actually
have the offset from syscon. However after the pbias device tree node
is moved as a child node of syscon, vsel_reg and enable_reg has the
absolute address because of the address translation that happens while
creating device
21 matches
Mail list logo