* Tony Lindgren t...@atomide.com [110505 08:56]:
So the problem is patches 1 8 in this series. The rest is just fine
as it's the necessary omap hardware specific implementation.
Sorry, patches 1 7 I mean.
Tony
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-omap in
the
From: Jean Pihet j-pi...@ti.com
Created arch/arm/plat-omap/omap-pm-constraints.c file from
arch/arm/plat-omap/omap-pm-noop.c and the associated Kconfig option
OMAP_PM_CONSTRAINTS.
Based on the original patch from Vishwanath,
cf. https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/327312/
Cc: Vishwanath BS
* jean.pi...@newoldbits.com jean.pi...@newoldbits.com [110504 06:32]:
+int omap_pm_set_max_mpu_wakeup_lat(struct device *dev, long t)
...
+int omap_pm_set_max_dev_wakeup_lat(struct device *req_dev, struct device
*dev,
...
+int omap_pm_set_min_clk_rate(struct device *dev, struct clk *c,
Tony,
Tony Lindgren t...@atomide.com writes:
* jean.pi...@newoldbits.com jean.pi...@newoldbits.com [110504 06:32]:
+int omap_pm_set_max_mpu_wakeup_lat(struct device *dev, long t)
...
+int omap_pm_set_max_dev_wakeup_lat(struct device *req_dev, struct device
*dev,
...
+int
From: Jean Pihet j-pi...@ti.com
Created arch/arm/plat-omap/omap-pm-constraints.c file from
arch/arm/plat-omap/omap-pm-noop.c and the associated Kconfig option
OMAP_PM_CONSTRAINTS.
Based on the original patch from Vishwanath,
cf. https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/327312/
Cc: Vishwanath BS
