On Wednesday 01 October 2008, Jean Delvare wrote:
> On Wed, 1 Oct 2008 08:58:12 -0700, David Brownell wrote:
> > On Wednesday 01 October 2008, Felipe Contreras wrote:
> > > Hmm, I'm seeing two different configs:
> > > CONFIG_TWL4030_GPIO
> > > CONFIG_GPIO_TWL4030
> > >
> > > I guess the defconfigs
On Wed, 1 Oct 2008 08:58:12 -0700, David Brownell wrote:
> On Wednesday 01 October 2008, Felipe Contreras wrote:
> > Hmm, I'm seeing two different configs:
> > CONFIG_TWL4030_GPIO
> > CONFIG_GPIO_TWL4030
> >
> > I guess the defconfigs are wrong.
>
> Right, they should get fixed.
>
> The same iss
On Wednesday 01 October 2008, Felipe Contreras wrote:
> Hmm, I'm seeing two different configs:
> CONFIG_TWL4030_GPIO
> CONFIG_GPIO_TWL4030
>
> I guess the defconfigs are wrong.
Right, they should get fixed.
The same issue will come when drivers/i2c/chips/twl4030-core.c
moves to drivers/mfd/twl40
On Wed, Oct 01, 2008 at 04:46:14PM +0300, ext Felipe Contreras wrote:
> Hmm, I'm seeing two different configs:
> CONFIG_TWL4030_GPIO
dropped
> CONFIG_GPIO_TWL4030
new one.
--
balbi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTE
On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 8:16 AM, David Brownell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Saturday 27 September 2008, Felipe Balbi wrote:
>> On Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 04:45:20PM -0700, David Brownell wrote:
>> > On Saturday 27 September 2008, Felipe Balbi wrote:
>> > > We need something like the patch below (I
On Saturday 27 September 2008, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 04:45:20PM -0700, David Brownell wrote:
> > On Saturday 27 September 2008, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> > > We need something like the patch below (I can't find a substitute
> > > to twl4030_set_gpio_edge_ctrl and twl4030_set_gpi
On Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 04:45:20PM -0700, David Brownell wrote:
> On Saturday 27 September 2008, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> > We need something like the patch below (I can't find a substitute
> > to twl4030_set_gpio_edge_ctrl and twl4030_set_gpio_debounce):
>
> Something like that, yes. I have other p
On Saturday 27 September 2008, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> We need something like the patch below (I can't find a substitute
> to twl4030_set_gpio_edge_ctrl and twl4030_set_gpio_debounce):
Something like that, yes. I have other patches queued up though.
And meanwhile, your build seems goofed ... fix t
On Saturday 27 September 2008, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> This patch breaks hsmmc.c:
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/built-in.o: In function `hsmmc_card_detect':
> /home/underline/workspace/linux-omap-2.6/arch/arm/mach-omap2/hsmmc.c:51:
> undefined reference to `twl4030_get_gpio_datain'
> ... etc
Could yo
On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 01:29:05AM +0300, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 02:41:40PM -0700, David Brownell wrote:
> > From: David Brownell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > Move the twl4030 GPIO support from drivers/i2c/chips to drivers/gpio,
> > which is a more appropriate home for this c
On Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 02:41:40PM -0700, David Brownell wrote:
> From: David Brownell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Move the twl4030 GPIO support from drivers/i2c/chips to drivers/gpio,
> which is a more appropriate home for this code.
>
> The Kconfig symbol name is changed to match the GPIO_* convent
From: David Brownell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Move the twl4030 GPIO support from drivers/i2c/chips to drivers/gpio,
which is a more appropriate home for this code.
The Kconfig symbol name is changed to match the GPIO_* convention for
such symbols, so config files must change in the obvious ways (Kconf
12 matches
Mail list logo
