, Sanjeev
Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org;
linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] omap2+: pm: cpufreq: Fix
loops_per_jiffy calculation
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 04:05:42PM +0530, Sanjeev Premi wrote:
Currently, loops_per_jiffy is being calculated before calling
> -Original Message-
> From: Shilimkar, Santosh
> Sent: Friday, June 24, 2011 6:16 PM
> To: Russell King - ARM Linux
> Cc: Premi, Sanjeev; linux-omap@vger.kernel.org;
> linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] omap2+: pm: cpufreq: Fix
> loo
@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] omap2+: pm: cpufreq: Fix
loops_per_jiffy calculation
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 04:05:42PM +0530, Sanjeev Premi wrote:
Currently, loops_per_jiffy is being calculated before calling
cpufreq_notify_transition().
However, generic
emi, Sanjeev
> > > Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org;
> linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org
> > > Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] omap2+: pm: cpufreq: Fix
> > > loops_per_jiffy calculation
> > >
> > > On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 04:05:42PM +0530, Sanjeev Premi
arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] omap2+: pm: cpufreq: Fix
> > loops_per_jiffy calculation
> >
> > On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 04:05:42PM +0530, Sanjeev Premi wrote:
> > > Currently, loops_per_jiffy is being calculated before calling
> >
> -Original Message-
> From: Russell King - ARM Linux [mailto:li...@arm.linux.org.uk]
> Sent: Friday, June 24, 2011 4:14 PM
> To: Premi, Sanjeev
> Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] omap2+: pm: cpufreq: Fix
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 04:05:42PM +0530, Sanjeev Premi wrote:
> Currently, loops_per_jiffy is being calculated before calling
> cpufreq_notify_transition().
>
> However, generic cpufreq driver adjusts the jiffies as well.
> Double adjustment leads to incorrect value being assigned to
> loops_per_
Currently, loops_per_jiffy is being calculated before calling
cpufreq_notify_transition().
However, generic cpufreq driver adjusts the jiffies as well.
Double adjustment leads to incorrect value being assigned to
loops_per_jiffy.
This manifests as incorrect BogoMIPS in "cat /proc/cpuinfo'
Signed
