On Fri, 28 Oct 2011 15:03:36 +0300, Tero Kristo said:
Hi Again,
I created a new version of the patch which should be better than this
hack, I'll send it as an RFC to the l-o list in a bit.
On Thu, 2011-10-13 at 13:49 +0200, Munegowda, Keshava wrote:
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 4:58 PM, Tero
...@vger.kernel.org; gadi...@ti.com; sa...@linux.intel.com;
t...@atomide.com; khil...@ti.com; johns...@us.ibm.com;
vishwanath...@ti.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5 v11] arm: omap: usb: ehci and ohci hwmod
structures for omap3
On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 12:00 PM, Paul Walmsley p...@pwsan.com
: omap: usb: ehci and ohci hwmod
structures for omap3
On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 12:00 PM, Paul Walmsley p...@pwsan.com
wrote:
On Fri, 23 Sep 2011, Munegowda, Keshava wrote:
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 11:31 PM, Paul Walmsley p...@pwsan.com
wrote:
But the question arises
...@vger.kernel.org; gadi...@ti.com; sa...@linux.intel.com;
t...@atomide.com; khil...@ti.com; johns...@us.ibm.com;
vishwanath...@ti.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5 v11] arm: omap: usb: ehci and ohci hwmod
structures for omap3
On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 12:00 PM, Paul Walmsley p...@pwsan.com wrote
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 11:46 PM, Paul Walmsley p...@pwsan.com wrote:
On Fri, 30 Sep 2011, Munegowda, Keshava wrote:
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 2:02 PM, Paul Walmsley p...@pwsan.com wrote:
On Wed, 28 Sep 2011, Munegowda, Keshava wrote:
Thanks paul,
But In USB Host case, there is a
On Wed, 28 Sep 2011, Munegowda, Keshava wrote:
Thanks paul,
But In USB Host case, there is a challenge!
I need both usbhost_48m_fck and usbhost_120m_fck to be turned on when
I invoke pm_runtime_get_sync ; so there are couple of options to do this
1. use clk_get with hard coded
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 2:02 PM, Paul Walmsley p...@pwsan.com wrote:
On Wed, 28 Sep 2011, Munegowda, Keshava wrote:
Thanks paul,
But In USB Host case, there is a challenge!
I need both usbhost_48m_fck and usbhost_120m_fck to be turned on when
I invoke pm_runtime_get_sync ; so there are
On Fri, 30 Sep 2011, Munegowda, Keshava wrote:
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 2:02 PM, Paul Walmsley p...@pwsan.com wrote:
On Wed, 28 Sep 2011, Munegowda, Keshava wrote:
Thanks paul,
But In USB Host case, there is a challenge!
I need both usbhost_48m_fck and usbhost_120m_fck to be turned
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 8:15 PM, Paul Walmsley p...@pwsan.com wrote:
On Mon, 26 Sep 2011, Munegowda, Keshava wrote:
On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 12:45 PM, Paul Walmsley p...@pwsan.com wrote:
On Fri, 23 Sep 2011, Munegowda, Keshava wrote:
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 11:31 PM, Paul Walmsley
; gadi...@ti.com; sa...@linux.intel.com;
t...@atomide.com; khil...@ti.com; johns...@us.ibm.com;
vishwanath...@ti.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5 v11] arm: omap: usb: ehci and ohci hwmod
structures for omap3
On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 12:00 PM, Paul Walmsley p...@pwsan.com wrote:
On Fri, 23 Sep 2011
2/5 v11] arm: omap: usb: ehci and ohci hwmod
structures for omap3
On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 12:00 PM, Paul Walmsley p...@pwsan.com wrote:
On Fri, 23 Sep 2011, Munegowda, Keshava wrote:
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 11:31 PM, Paul Walmsley p...@pwsan.com
wrote:
But the question arises here
...@ti.com; johns...@us.ibm.com;
vishwanath...@ti.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5 v11] arm: omap: usb: ehci and ohci hwmod
structures for omap3
On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 12:00 PM, Paul Walmsley p...@pwsan.com wrote:
On Fri, 23 Sep 2011, Munegowda, Keshava wrote:
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 11:31 PM
Hi,
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 06:48:35PM +0530, Munegowda, Keshava wrote:
So, you would need a mechanism to do something like this:
pad a or b wakeup detected - irq0
pad c or d wakeup detected - irq1?
yes, if get something like this , its perfect.
can't you have different IRQs for each
; linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org; Gadiyar, Anand;
sa...@linux.intel.com; t...@atomide.com; Hilman, Kevin;
johns...@us.ibm.com; Sripathy, Vishwanath
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5 v11] arm: omap: usb: ehci and ohci hwmod
structures for omap3
Hi,
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 06:48:35PM +0530, Munegowda, Keshava wrote
On Tue, 2011-09-27 at 15:24 +0200, Balbi, Felipe wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 06:48:35PM +0530, Munegowda, Keshava wrote:
So, you would need a mechanism to do something like this:
pad a or b wakeup detected - irq0
pad c or d wakeup detected - irq1?
yes, if get something
hi,
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 05:38:51PM +0300, Tero Kristo wrote:
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 06:48:35PM +0530, Munegowda, Keshava wrote:
So, you would need a mechanism to do something like this:
pad a or b wakeup detected - irq0
pad c or d wakeup detected - irq1?
yes, if get
On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 12:00 PM, Paul Walmsley p...@pwsan.com wrote:
On Fri, 23 Sep 2011, Munegowda, Keshava wrote:
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 11:31 PM, Paul Walmsley p...@pwsan.com wrote:
But the question arises here , why do we need these ehci and ohci as two
different hwmods containing only
On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 12:45 PM, Paul Walmsley p...@pwsan.com wrote:
On Fri, 23 Sep 2011, Munegowda, Keshava wrote:
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 11:31 PM, Paul Walmsley p...@pwsan.com wrote:
On Thu, 22 Sep 2011, Keshava Munegowda wrote:
4. usb_tll_hs hwmod of usbhs with the TLL base address
On Mon, 26 Sep 2011, Munegowda, Keshava wrote:
On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 12:45 PM, Paul Walmsley p...@pwsan.com wrote:
On Fri, 23 Sep 2011, Munegowda, Keshava wrote:
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 11:31 PM, Paul Walmsley p...@pwsan.com wrote:
On Thu, 22 Sep 2011, Keshava Munegowda wrote:
On Fri, 23 Sep 2011, Munegowda, Keshava wrote:
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 11:31 PM, Paul Walmsley p...@pwsan.com wrote:
But the question arises here , why do we need these ehci and ohci as two
different hwmods containing only irq and base address? It is required
for future - to implement
On Fri, 23 Sep 2011, Munegowda, Keshava wrote:
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 11:31 PM, Paul Walmsley p...@pwsan.com wrote:
On Thu, 22 Sep 2011, Keshava Munegowda wrote:
4. usb_tll_hs hwmod of usbhs with the TLL base address and irq.
Signed-off-by: Keshava Munegowda keshava_mgo...@ti.com
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 11:31 PM, Paul Walmsley p...@pwsan.com wrote:
Hi
a few comments
On Thu, 22 Sep 2011, Keshava Munegowda wrote:
following 4 hwmod structures are added
1. usb_host_hs hwmod of usbhs with uhh base address and functional clock,
2. usb_ehci_hs hwmod with irq and base
following 4 hwmod structures are added
1. usb_host_hs hwmod of usbhs with uhh base address and functional clock,
2. usb_ehci_hs hwmod with irq and base address,
3. usb_ohci_hs hwmod with irq and base address,
- the ehci and ohci hwmods does not require functional clock
because
Hi
a few comments
On Thu, 22 Sep 2011, Keshava Munegowda wrote:
following 4 hwmod structures are added
1. usb_host_hs hwmod of usbhs with uhh base address and functional clock,
2. usb_ehci_hs hwmod with irq and base address,
3. usb_ohci_hs hwmod with irq and base address,
- the ehci
24 matches
Mail list logo
