* Arnaud Patard arnaud.pat...@rtp-net.org [130620 00:36]:
Tony Lindgren t...@atomide.com writes:
Hi,
* Arnaud Patard arnaud.pat...@rtp-net.org [130619 02:52]:
Tony Lindgren t...@atomide.com writes:
Hi,
* Tony Lindgren t...@atomide.com [130617 03:32]:
* Arnaud Patard
Tony Lindgren t...@atomide.com writes:
Hi,
* Arnaud Patard arnaud.pat...@rtp-net.org [130619 02:52]:
Tony Lindgren t...@atomide.com writes:
Hi,
* Tony Lindgren t...@atomide.com [130617 03:32]:
* Arnaud Patard arnaud.pat...@rtp-net.org [130617 02:52]:
Tony Lindgren t...@atomide.com
Tony Lindgren t...@atomide.com writes:
Hi,
* Tony Lindgren t...@atomide.com [130617 03:32]:
* Arnaud Patard arnaud.pat...@rtp-net.org [130617 02:52]:
Tony Lindgren t...@atomide.com writes:
I understand your concerns but, please, cope with reality: the clock
work is not in -next so
* Arnaud Patard arnaud.pat...@rtp-net.org [130619 02:52]:
Tony Lindgren t...@atomide.com writes:
Hi,
* Tony Lindgren t...@atomide.com [130617 03:32]:
* Arnaud Patard arnaud.pat...@rtp-net.org [130617 02:52]:
Tony Lindgren t...@atomide.com writes:
I understand your concerns but,
* Tony Lindgren t...@atomide.com [130617 03:32]:
* Arnaud Patard arnaud.pat...@rtp-net.org [130617 02:52]:
Tony Lindgren t...@atomide.com writes:
I understand your concerns but, please, cope with reality: the clock
work is not in -next so this tends to make me think it won't reach
On Friday 14 June 2013 07:28 PM, Ming Lei wrote:
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 9:31 PM, Ming Lei tom.leim...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 6:12 PM, Sricharan R r.sricha...@ti.com wrote:
On Thursday 13 June 2013 02:51 PM, Sricharan R wrote:
Hi Tony,
On Wednesday 12 June 2013 10:44 PM,
Sricharan R r.sricha...@ti.com writes:
Hi,
[...]
Starting kernel ...
[0.00] Booting Linux on physical CPU 0x0
[0.00] Linux version 3.10.0-rc4-next-20130607 (a0393807@uda0393807)
(gcc version 4.6.3 (Sourcery CodeBench Lite 2012.03-57) ) #18 SMP Mon Jun 17
12:55:05 IST
On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 4:06 PM, Arnaud Patard
arnaud.pat...@rtp-net.org wrote:
Sricharan R r.sricha...@ti.com writes:
I hoped to have missed some mails and that people were testing pandabard
support with full support but given what I see, the ethernet support is
not there yet. This thread is
* Arnaud Patard arnaud.pat...@rtp-net.org [130617 01:13]:
I hoped to have missed some mails and that people were testing pandabard
support with full support but given what I see, the ethernet support is
not there yet. This thread is about removing the non-DT boot. I see some
contradiction
* Ming Lei tom.leim...@gmail.com [130617 01:22]:
On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 4:06 PM, Arnaud Patard
arnaud.pat...@rtp-net.org wrote:
Sricharan R r.sricha...@ti.com writes:
I hoped to have missed some mails and that people were testing pandabard
support with full support but given what I see,
On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 4:27 PM, Tony Lindgren t...@atomide.com wrote:
Too quick? The basic DT based booting has been working for a few years
now to some extent on omaps :)
I mean it is OK to drop legacy mode now if it won't break old system.
Otherwise, it is better to slow down the dropping
* Ming Lei tom.leim...@gmail.com [130617 01:47]:
On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 4:27 PM, Tony Lindgren t...@atomide.com wrote:
Too quick? The basic DT based booting has been working for a few years
now to some extent on omaps :)
I mean it is OK to drop legacy mode now if it won't break old
Tony Lindgren t...@atomide.com writes:
Hi,
* Arnaud Patard arnaud.pat...@rtp-net.org [130617 01:13]:
I hoped to have missed some mails and that people were testing pandabard
support with full support but given what I see, the ethernet support is
not there yet. This thread is about removing
* Arnaud Patard arnaud.pat...@rtp-net.org [130617 02:52]:
Tony Lindgren t...@atomide.com writes:
I understand your concerns but, please, cope with reality: the clock
work is not in -next so this tends to make me think it won't reach
3.11. We're at -rc6 after all. Telling users that their
On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 6:12 PM, Sricharan R r.sricha...@ti.com wrote:
On Thursday 13 June 2013 02:51 PM, Sricharan R wrote:
Hi Tony,
On Wednesday 12 June 2013 10:44 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
* Tony Lindgren t...@atomide.com [130612 09:37]:
* Ming Lei tom.leim...@gmail.com [130603 08:34]:
Hi,
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 9:31 PM, Ming Lei tom.leim...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 6:12 PM, Sricharan R r.sricha...@ti.com wrote:
On Thursday 13 June 2013 02:51 PM, Sricharan R wrote:
Hi Tony,
On Wednesday 12 June 2013 10:44 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
* Tony Lindgren
Hi Tony,
On Wednesday 12 June 2013 10:44 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
* Tony Lindgren t...@atomide.com [130612 09:37]:
* Ming Lei tom.leim...@gmail.com [130603 08:34]:
Hi,
On Sat, May 18, 2013 at 3:17 AM, Tony Lindgren t...@atomide.com wrote:
We can now boot with device tree. If you don't want
On Thursday 13 June 2013 02:51 PM, Sricharan R wrote:
Hi Tony,
On Wednesday 12 June 2013 10:44 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
* Tony Lindgren t...@atomide.com [130612 09:37]:
* Ming Lei tom.leim...@gmail.com [130603 08:34]:
Hi,
On Sat, May 18, 2013 at 3:17 AM, Tony Lindgren t...@atomide.com
* Sricharan R r.sricha...@ti.com [130613 03:18]:
I tried your cleanup branch omap-for-v3.11/cleanup on panda board and it
booted
to prompt fine.
Hardware: Pandaboard A1 dtb: omap4-panda.dtb
OK thanks for testing.
git pull on linux-next branch was not working
On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 7:05 PM, Tony Lindgren t...@atomide.com wrote:
* Sricharan R r.sricha...@ti.com [130613 03:18]:
I tried your cleanup branch omap-for-v3.11/cleanup on panda board and it
booted
to prompt fine.
Hardware: Pandaboard A1 dtb: omap4-panda.dtb
OK
* Ming Lei tom.leim...@gmail.com [130603 08:34]:
Hi,
On Sat, May 18, 2013 at 3:17 AM, Tony Lindgren t...@atomide.com wrote:
We can now boot with device tree. If you don't want to update u-boot,
you can boot with appended DTB with the following instructions:
1. Make sure you have the
* Tony Lindgren t...@atomide.com [130612 09:37]:
* Ming Lei tom.leim...@gmail.com [130603 08:34]:
Hi,
On Sat, May 18, 2013 at 3:17 AM, Tony Lindgren t...@atomide.com wrote:
We can now boot with device tree. If you don't want to update u-boot,
you can boot with appended DTB with the
Hi,
On Sat, May 18, 2013 at 3:17 AM, Tony Lindgren t...@atomide.com wrote:
We can now boot with device tree. If you don't want to update u-boot,
you can boot with appended DTB with the following instructions:
1. Make sure you have the appended DTB support in .config
We can now boot with device tree. If you don't want to update u-boot,
you can boot with appended DTB with the following instructions:
1. Make sure you have the appended DTB support in .config
CONFIG_ARM_APPENDED_DTB=y
CONFIG_ARM_ATAG_DTB_COMPAT=y
24 matches
Mail list logo
