On Wed, 18 Nov 2009, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> To me it sounds like this can wait until the merge window,
> so not adding to omap-fixes for now.
Indeed, there's no rush on this one, so let's set it up for 2.6.33.
I'll keep that macro in plat/system.h unless you or Russell have a better
suggestion.
; > >Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 2009 11:39 AM
> > >To: Russell King - ARM Linux
> > >Cc: linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org; Juha Leppänen;
> > >linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
> > >Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] OMAP clock/hwmod: fix off-by-one errors
> >
&g
sell King - ARM Linux
> >Cc: linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org; Juha Leppänen;
> >linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
> >Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] OMAP clock/hwmod: fix off-by-one errors
>
> >
> >+/**
> >+ * omap_test_timeout - busy-loop, testing a condition
> >+ *
eppänen;
>linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
>Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] OMAP clock/hwmod: fix off-by-one errors
>
>+/**
>+ * omap_test_timeout - busy-loop, testing a condition
>+ * @cond: condition to test until it evaluates to true
>+ * @timeout: maximum number of microseconds in th
Hi Russell,
On Mon, 16 Nov 2009, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 06:36:55AM -0700, Paul Walmsley wrote:
> > Fix loop bailout off-by-one bugs reported by Juha Leppänen
> > .
>
> I'm not sure the new code is any easier to read than the old code.
> And what with some check
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 06:36:55AM -0700, Paul Walmsley wrote:
> Fix loop bailout off-by-one bugs reported by Juha Leppänen
> .
I'm not sure the new code is any easier to read than the old code.
And what with some checks post-loop being <= and others being >, it's
a recipe for cut'n'paste errors h
Fix loop bailout off-by-one bugs reported by Juha Leppänen
.
Signed-off-by: Paul Walmsley
Cc: Juha Leppänen
---
arch/arm/mach-omap2/cm.c |2 +-
arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod.c | 12 +---
arch/arm/mach-omap2/prcm.c |4 ++--
3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 10 de
