We want to have static pin states handled separately from
dynamic pin states, so let's add optional state_active.
Then if state_active is defined, let's check and make sure
state_idle and state_sleep match state_active for the
pin groups to avoid checking them during runtime as the
active and idle
* Tony Lindgren [130718 00:57]:
> * Stephen Warren [130717 14:28]:
> >
> > Oh, I see you're trying to check that the set of pins in the active,
> > sleep, and idle states are identical.
>
> Right, that's to avoid any further checking during runtime for runtime PM.
>
> > But I think that pinct
* Stephen Warren [130717 14:28]:
> On 07/16/2013 03:05 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > We want to have static pin states handled separately from
> > dynamic pin states, so let's add optional state_active.
> >
> > Then if state_active is defined, let's check and make sure
> > state_idle and state_sle
On 07/16/2013 03:05 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> We want to have static pin states handled separately from
> dynamic pin states, so let's add optional state_active.
>
> Then if state_active is defined, let's check and make sure
> state_idle and state_sleep match state_active for the
> pin groups to
We want to have static pin states handled separately from
dynamic pin states, so let's add optional state_active.
Then if state_active is defined, let's check and make sure
state_idle and state_sleep match state_active for the
pin groups to avoid checking them during runtime as the
active and idle
