Hi,
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 11:21:04AM +0200, Mark Brown wrote:
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 12:04:55PM +0300, Eduardo Valentin wrote:
Right. Should we add 4 instances of drvdd and 2 of iovdd? So, naming those
would be like:
No, if there's multiple pins for the supply then there's no need
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 12:13:00PM +0300, Eduardo Valentin wrote:
[Please fix your MUA to wrap before 80 columns.]
Might be a stupid question probably because of my lack of knowledge of
regulator framework, but if the driver code must be written in such a
way that it requires all regulators
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 10:23:32AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 12:13:00PM +0300, Eduardo Valentin wrote:
Might be a stupid question probably because of my lack of knowledge of
regulator framework, but if the driver code must be written in such a
way that it requires
On Thu, Oct 08, 2009 at 03:26:19PM +0200, Mark Brown wrote:
On Thu, Oct 08, 2009 at 02:58:55PM +0300, Eduardo Valentin wrote:
+static struct regulator_consumer_supply rx51_vmmc2_supplies[] = {
+ REGULATOR_SUPPLY(avdd_dac, 2-0018), /* tlv320aic3x */
+ REGULATOR_SUPPLY(vdd, 2-0060), /*
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 12:04:55PM +0300, Eduardo Valentin wrote:
Right. Should we add 4 instances of drvdd and 2 of iovdd? So, naming those
would be like:
No, if there's multiple pins for the supply then there's no need to
represent those individually - they're required to be wired together
From: Eduardo Valentin eduardo.valen...@nokia.com
This patch adds two supplies for VMMC2 on rx51 boards.
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin eduardo.valen...@nokia.com
---
arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-rx51-peripherals.c | 14 +++---
1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff
On Thu, Oct 08, 2009 at 02:58:55PM +0300, Eduardo Valentin wrote:
+static struct regulator_consumer_supply rx51_vmmc2_supplies[] = {
+ REGULATOR_SUPPLY(avdd_dac, 2-0018), /* tlv320aic3x */
+ REGULATOR_SUPPLY(vdd, 2-0060), /* tpa6130a2*/
};
avdd_dac is the only supply added for the
