The revision register on OMAP4 is a 16-bit lo and a 16-bit
hi. Currently the driver reads only the lower 8-bits.
Fix the same by preventing the truncating of the rev register
for OMAP4.
Also use the scheme bit ie bit-14 of the hi register to know if it
is OMAP_I2C_IP_VERSION_2.
On platforms
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 2:29 PM, Shubhrajyoti D shubhrajy...@ti.com wrote:
The revision register on OMAP4 is a 16-bit lo and a 16-bit
hi. Currently the driver reads only the lower 8-bits.
Fix the same by preventing the truncating of the rev register
for OMAP4.
Also use the scheme bit ie
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 02:29:19PM +0530, Shubhrajyoti D wrote:
The revision register on OMAP4 is a 16-bit lo and a 16-bit
hi. Currently the driver reads only the lower 8-bits.
Fix the same by preventing the truncating of the rev register
for OMAP4.
very good, but you need to test this
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 03:02:57PM +0530, Shubhrajyoti Datta wrote:
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 2:29 PM, Shubhrajyoti D shubhrajy...@ti.com wrote:
The revision register on OMAP4 is a 16-bit lo and a 16-bit
hi. Currently the driver reads only the lower 8-bits.
Fix the same by preventing the
On Wednesday 31 October 2012 03:42 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 02:29:19PM +0530, Shubhrajyoti D wrote:
The revision register on OMAP4 is a 16-bit lo and a 16-bit
hi. Currently the driver reads only the lower 8-bits.
Fix the same by preventing the truncating of the rev
On Wednesday 31 October 2012 03:42 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
+ if (!_dev-regs)
+ return 0;
this is wrong, you need to make sure dev-regs is set early enough.
to set the dev-regs I use the value read from revision register.
to read the revision register I do a get_sync first.
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 04:18:15PM +0530, Shubhrajyoti wrote:
On Wednesday 31 October 2012 03:42 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 02:29:19PM +0530, Shubhrajyoti D wrote:
The revision register on OMAP4 is a 16-bit lo and a 16-bit
hi. Currently the driver reads
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 04:28:38PM +0530, Shubhrajyoti wrote:
On Wednesday 31 October 2012 03:42 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
+if (!_dev-regs)
+return 0;
this is wrong, you need to make sure dev-regs is set early enough.
to set the dev-regs I use the value
