On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 3:47 PM, AnilKumar, Chimata wrote:
> On Mon, May 07, 2012 at 10:51:53, J, KEERTHY wrote:
>> On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 2:42 PM, AnilKumar, Chimata wrote:
>> > On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 23:10:36, J, KEERTHY wrote:
>> >> From: Jean Pihet
>> >>
>> >> Now that omap_test_timeout is o
On Mon, May 07, 2012 at 10:51:53, J, KEERTHY wrote:
> On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 2:42 PM, AnilKumar, Chimata wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 23:10:36, J, KEERTHY wrote:
> >> From: Jean Pihet
> >>
> >> Now that omap_test_timeout is only accessible from mach-omap2/,
> >> introduce a similar function
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 2:42 PM, AnilKumar, Chimata wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 23:10:36, J, KEERTHY wrote:
>> From: Jean Pihet
>>
>> Now that omap_test_timeout is only accessible from mach-omap2/,
>> introduce a similar function for SR.
>>
>> This change makes the SmartReflex implementation
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 23:10:36, J, KEERTHY wrote:
> From: Jean Pihet
>
> Now that omap_test_timeout is only accessible from mach-omap2/,
> introduce a similar function for SR.
>
> This change makes the SmartReflex implementation ready for the move
> to drivers/.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jean Pihet
From: Jean Pihet
Now that omap_test_timeout is only accessible from mach-omap2/,
introduce a similar function for SR.
This change makes the SmartReflex implementation ready for the move
to drivers/.
Signed-off-by: Jean Pihet
Signed-off-by: J Keerthy
---
arch/arm/mach-omap2/smartreflex.c |