Can you comment on this ? As of today i2c-based drivers will probe with
DT-based boot if DT's compatible is set to the same id as in struct
i2c_device_id. No i2c driver with of_device_id can autoprobe using OF
ids.
Long standing problem. Last one to tackle this was Lee Jones:
Hi Wolfram,
On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 02:19:07PM -0600, Felipe Balbi wrote:
On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 12:14:21PM -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 02:03:40PM -0600, Felipe Balbi wrote:
On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 11:59:02AM -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
On Tue, Nov 18, 2014
Because with OF we can pass more specific
compatible flags (such as edt-ft5306) instead
of generic edt-ft5x06, when i2c-core's
of_i2c_register_devices() tries to request_module(),
it'll request it with a non-existent specific module
alias.
In order to have this driver autoprobing again, we
just
On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 01:27:42PM -0600, Felipe Balbi wrote:
Because with OF we can pass more specific
compatible flags (such as edt-ft5306) instead
of generic edt-ft5x06, when i2c-core's
of_i2c_register_devices() tries to request_module(),
it'll request it with a non-existent specific
On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 01:27:42PM -0600, Felipe Balbi wrote:
Because with OF we can pass more specific
compatible flags (such as edt-ft5306) instead
of generic edt-ft5x06, when i2c-core's
of_i2c_register_devices() tries to request_module(),
it'll request it with a non-existent specific
On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 11:59:02AM -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 01:27:42PM -0600, Felipe Balbi wrote:
Because with OF we can pass more specific
compatible flags (such as edt-ft5306) instead
of generic edt-ft5x06, when i2c-core's
of_i2c_register_devices() tries to
On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 02:03:40PM -0600, Felipe Balbi wrote:
On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 11:59:02AM -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 01:27:42PM -0600, Felipe Balbi wrote:
Because with OF we can pass more specific
compatible flags (such as edt-ft5306) instead
of
On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 12:14:21PM -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 02:03:40PM -0600, Felipe Balbi wrote:
On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 11:59:02AM -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 01:27:42PM -0600, Felipe Balbi wrote:
Because with OF we can pass more
