* Linus Walleij [121104 09:39]:
> On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 3:12 PM, AnilKumar, Chimata wrote:
> > I have two options now
> > - add only default states for now, I can add reset of
> > the state details once suspend/resume is supported.
> > - add same values in all the states, modify those once
> >
On Sun, Nov 04, 2012 at 23:07:44, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 3:12 PM, AnilKumar, Chimata wrote:
>
> > I completely understood this named modes, I have added named
> > modes like this in am335x-xxx.dts files
>
> I do not understand how the pinctrl-single dts files work actuall
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 3:12 PM, AnilKumar, Chimata wrote:
> I completely understood this named modes, I have added named
> modes like this in am335x-xxx.dts files
I do not understand how the pinctrl-single dts files work actually,
so please get Tony to review this part.
> I think "pinctrl-1" s
On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 18:06:10, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 12:52 PM, AnilKumar, Chimata wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 01:29:37, Linus Walleij wrote:
>
> >> This is what we're doing for ux500 and should be a good model.
> >
> > I have looked into this, but not seen any na
* AnilKumar, Chimata [121003 03:53]:
> On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 01:29:37, Linus Walleij wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 5:44 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> >
> > >> OK that is typical pinctrl driver implementation work.
> > >> I hope Tony can advice on this?
> > >
> > > I think we're best off to ju
On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 12:52 PM, AnilKumar, Chimata wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 01:29:37, Linus Walleij wrote:
>> This is what we're doing for ux500 and should be a good model.
>
> I have looked into this, but not seen any named modes.
OK maybe it's not easy to find. If you look into:
arch/
On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 01:29:37, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 5:44 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
>
> >> OK that is typical pinctrl driver implementation work.
> >> I hope Tony can advice on this?
> >
> > I think we're best off to just stick to alternative named modes
> > passed from
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 5:44 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
>> OK that is typical pinctrl driver implementation work.
>> I hope Tony can advice on this?
>
> I think we're best off to just stick to alternative named modes
> passed from device tree. For example, for GPIO wake-ups you can
> have named mode
* Linus Walleij [121001 01:25]:
> On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 9:03 AM, AnilKumar, Chimata wrote:
>
> >I have gone through the "Don Aisheng" patch series, which
> > adds "pinctrl_dt_add_gpio_ranges" support but not accepted
> > yet. With this patch series we can overcome the driver changes.
>
> O
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 9:03 AM, AnilKumar, Chimata wrote:
>I have gone through the "Don Aisheng" patch series, which
> adds "pinctrl_dt_add_gpio_ranges" support but not accepted
> yet. With this patch series we can overcome the driver changes.
OK then this is the direction we need to go.
>
+Don Aisheng
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 01:10:12, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 1, 2012 at 10:16 AM, AnilKumar Ch wrote:
>
> > Adopt pinctrl support to leds-gpio driver based on leds-gpio
> > device pointer, pinctrl driver configure SoC pins to GPIO
> > mode according to definitions provided i
On 09/10/2012 01:34 PM, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 7:41 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
>> On 09/10/2012 09:23 AM, Linus Walleij wrote:
>
>> That seems like exactly what we were trying to avoid when we added the
>> possibility for GPIO to call into pinctrl.
>>
>> Documentation/gpio.
On Sat, Sep 1, 2012 at 10:16 AM, AnilKumar Ch wrote:
> Adopt pinctrl support to leds-gpio driver based on leds-gpio
> device pointer, pinctrl driver configure SoC pins to GPIO
> mode according to definitions provided in .dts file.
>
> Signed-off-by: AnilKumar Ch
So looking back at this after St
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 7:41 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 09/10/2012 09:23 AM, Linus Walleij wrote:
> That seems like exactly what we were trying to avoid when we added the
> possibility for GPIO to call into pinctrl.
>
> Documentation/gpio.txt already contains:
>
>> For GPIOs that use pins kno
On 09/10/2012 09:23 AM, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 9, 2012 at 1:44 AM, Domenico Andreoli wrote:
>> On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 11:57:59PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
>>>
>>> If all you need to to is to multiplex the pins into GPIO mode,
>>> then the gpio_get() call on this driver *can* call th
On Sun, Sep 9, 2012 at 1:44 AM, Domenico Andreoli wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 11:57:59PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
>>
>> If all you need to to is to multiplex the pins into GPIO mode,
>> then the gpio_get() call on this driver *can* call through to
>> pinctrl_request_gpio() which will in tu
On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 11:57:59PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 6:00 PM, Domenico Andreoli wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 02:30:59PM +, AnilKumar, Chimata wrote:
>
> >> How can gpio driver knows that leds-gpio driver require
> >> these 4 pins?
> >
> > because leds-
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 6:35 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> In the pure GPIO pins only case it could be all done in the GPIO controller,
> but it's probably best to have the pins muxed by the drivers using them.
Yes, that's an easier way to say the long unreadable thing I just
posted ...
> Some driv
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 6:00 PM, Domenico Andreoli wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 02:30:59PM +, AnilKumar, Chimata wrote:
>> How can gpio driver knows that leds-gpio driver require
>> these 4 pins?
>
> because leds-gpio requests each gpio (specified in the DT against a specific
> gpio contro
* Linus Walleij [120907 14:40]:
> On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 7:45 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
>
> >> > The warning should be pinctrl related as the pinctrl drivers may not be
> >> > device tree based drivers.
> >>
> >> Exactly my concern. Also the warning shouldnt be present on systems where
> >> pinct
On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 7:45 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
>> > The warning should be pinctrl related as the pinctrl drivers may not be
>> > device tree based drivers.
>>
>> Exactly my concern. Also the warning shouldnt be present on systems where
>> pinctrl is disabled.
>
> But pinctrl_get_select() re
On Sat, Sep 1, 2012 at 10:16 AM, AnilKumar Ch wrote:
> Adopt pinctrl support to leds-gpio driver based on leds-gpio
> device pointer, pinctrl driver configure SoC pins to GPIO
> mode according to definitions provided in .dts file.
>
> Signed-off-by: AnilKumar Ch
Looks good from a pinctrl point
* Domenico Andreoli [120907 09:01]:
>
> So is this the preferred way to attach gpio users to gpio provides in DT
> whenever gpios are muxed?
>
> I would well see these info hidden in the gpio controller so, at least
> for gpios, no magic numbers would be required in the DT (except the gpio
> num
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 3:59 PM, AnilKumar, Chimata wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 05:39:35, Marek Vasut wrote:
>> Dear Tony Lindgren,
>>
>> > * Marek Vasut [120905 19:05]:
>> > > Hi Tony,
>> > >
>> > > > * Marek Vasut [120904 20:13]:
>> > > > > Dear Bryan Wu,
>> > > > >
>> > > > > > On Sat, Se
On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 02:30:59PM +, AnilKumar, Chimata wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 16:32:51, Domenico Andreoli wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 09:10:50AM +, AnilKumar, Chimata wrote:
> > > On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 14:18:39, Domenico Andreoli wrote:
> > > > On Sat, Sep 1, 2012 at 10
On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 16:32:51, Domenico Andreoli wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 09:10:50AM +, AnilKumar, Chimata wrote:
> > Hi Domenico,
>
> Hi,
>
> > On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 14:18:39, Domenico Andreoli wrote:
> > > On Sat, Sep 1, 2012 at 10:16 AM, AnilKumar Ch wrote:
> > > > Adopt pinc
On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 09:10:50AM +, AnilKumar, Chimata wrote:
> Hi Domenico,
Hi,
> On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 14:18:39, Domenico Andreoli wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 1, 2012 at 10:16 AM, AnilKumar Ch wrote:
> > > Adopt pinctrl support to leds-gpio driver based on leds-gpio
> > > device pointer, pi
Hi Domenico,
On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 14:18:39, Domenico Andreoli wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 1, 2012 at 10:16 AM, AnilKumar Ch wrote:
> > Adopt pinctrl support to leds-gpio driver based on leds-gpio
> > device pointer, pinctrl driver configure SoC pins to GPIO
> > mode according to definitions provided
On Sat, Sep 1, 2012 at 10:16 AM, AnilKumar Ch wrote:
> Adopt pinctrl support to leds-gpio driver based on leds-gpio
> device pointer, pinctrl driver configure SoC pins to GPIO
> mode according to definitions provided in .dts file.
Shouldn't be the interaction with the pinctrl layer left to gpioli
Dear AnilKumar, Chimata,
> On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 05:39:35, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > Dear Tony Lindgren,
> >
> > > * Marek Vasut [120905 19:05]:
> > > > Hi Tony,
> > > >
> > > > > * Marek Vasut [120904 20:13]:
> > > > > > Dear Bryan Wu,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Sat, Sep 1, 2012 at 4:16 PM,
On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 05:39:35, Marek Vasut wrote:
> Dear Tony Lindgren,
>
> > * Marek Vasut [120905 19:05]:
> > > Hi Tony,
> > >
> > > > * Marek Vasut [120904 20:13]:
> > > > > Dear Bryan Wu,
> > > > >
> > > > > > On Sat, Sep 1, 2012 at 4:16 PM, AnilKumar Ch
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
Dear Tony Lindgren,
> * Marek Vasut [120905 19:05]:
> > Hi Tony,
> >
> > > * Marek Vasut [120904 20:13]:
> > > > Dear Bryan Wu,
> > > >
> > > > > On Sat, Sep 1, 2012 at 4:16 PM, AnilKumar Ch wrote:
> > > > > > Adopt pinctrl support to leds-gpio driver based on leds-gpio
> > > > > > device poi
* Marek Vasut [120905 19:05]:
> Hi Tony,
>
> > * Marek Vasut [120904 20:13]:
> > > Dear Bryan Wu,
> > >
> > > > On Sat, Sep 1, 2012 at 4:16 PM, AnilKumar Ch wrote:
> > > > > Adopt pinctrl support to leds-gpio driver based on leds-gpio
> > > > > device pointer, pinctrl driver configure SoC pins
Hi Tony,
> * Marek Vasut [120904 20:13]:
> > Dear Bryan Wu,
> >
> > > On Sat, Sep 1, 2012 at 4:16 PM, AnilKumar Ch wrote:
> > > > Adopt pinctrl support to leds-gpio driver based on leds-gpio
> > > > device pointer, pinctrl driver configure SoC pins to GPIO
> > > > mode according to definitions
* Marek Vasut [120904 20:13]:
> Dear Bryan Wu,
>
> > On Sat, Sep 1, 2012 at 4:16 PM, AnilKumar Ch wrote:
> > > Adopt pinctrl support to leds-gpio driver based on leds-gpio
> > > device pointer, pinctrl driver configure SoC pins to GPIO
> > > mode according to definitions provided in .dts file.
>
Dear Bryan Wu,
> On Sat, Sep 1, 2012 at 4:16 PM, AnilKumar Ch wrote:
> > Adopt pinctrl support to leds-gpio driver based on leds-gpio
> > device pointer, pinctrl driver configure SoC pins to GPIO
> > mode according to definitions provided in .dts file.
>
> Thanks for this, actually Marek Vasut s
On Sat, Sep 1, 2012 at 4:16 PM, AnilKumar Ch wrote:
> Adopt pinctrl support to leds-gpio driver based on leds-gpio
> device pointer, pinctrl driver configure SoC pins to GPIO
> mode according to definitions provided in .dts file.
>
Thanks for this, actually Marek Vasut submitted a similar patch
b
Adopt pinctrl support to leds-gpio driver based on leds-gpio
device pointer, pinctrl driver configure SoC pins to GPIO
mode according to definitions provided in .dts file.
Signed-off-by: AnilKumar Ch
---
Changes from v1:
- Seperated from "Add DT for AM33XX devices" patch series
-
38 matches
Mail list logo
