Hi Mike,
On Tuesday 13 November 2012 08:43:23 Mike Turquette wrote:
> Quoting Laurent Pinchart (2012-11-13 05:42:35)
> > On Wednesday 07 November 2012 17:12:35 Mike Turquette wrote:
> > > From: Mike Turquette
> > >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > This series is based on top of Paul's PRM/CM clean-up
Quoting Laurent Pinchart (2012-11-13 05:42:35)
> Hi Mike,
>
> Thank you for the patches.
>
> On Wednesday 07 November 2012 17:12:35 Mike Turquette wrote:
> > From: Mike Turquette
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > This series is based on top of Paul's PRM/CM clean-up work. It is a
> > refresh of the pat
Hi Mike,
Thank you for the patches.
On Wednesday 07 November 2012 17:12:35 Mike Turquette wrote:
> From: Mike Turquette
>
> Hi all,
>
> This series is based on top of Paul's PRM/CM clean-up work. It is a
> refresh of the patches Rajendra sent out a while back[1], with the
> addition of severa
On Fri, 9 Nov 2012, Mike Turquette wrote:
> I just did some more testing on your branch and everything looks great.
> The only thing that caught my eye was using the clk-private.h header in
> the top-most patch. The following patch will help me sleep better at
> night:
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/
Quoting Paul Walmsley (2012-11-09 13:12:24)
> Hi
>
> With the fixes that have been posted, this is testing clean here. Mike
> and Rajendra have put in months of work on these patches under
> often-difficult conditions, and it's really great that we've arrived at
> this point with zero obvious
* Paul Walmsley [121109 13:14]:
>
> Hi
>
> With the fixes that have been posted, this is testing clean here. Mike
> and Rajendra have put in months of work on these patches under
> often-difficult conditions, and it's really great that we've arrived at
> this point with zero obvious remainin
Hi
With the fixes that have been posted, this is testing clean here. Mike
and Rajendra have put in months of work on these patches under
often-difficult conditions, and it's really great that we've arrived at
this point with zero obvious remaining regressions from the current code.
The bran
Mike Turquette writes:
> Quoting Rajendra Nayak (2012-11-07 21:02:59)
>> On Thursday 08 November 2012 06:42 AM, Mike Turquette wrote:
>> > I also tested on OMAP4460 Panda-ES. Boot is fine and PRCM programming
>> > appears sane. However Panda-ES never comes back from suspend/resume.
>> > This pr
On 11/8/2012 6:42 AM, Mike Turquette wrote:
> From: Mike Turquette
>
> Hi all,
>
> This series is based on top of Paul's PRM/CM clean-up work. It is a
> refresh of the patches Rajendra sent out a while back[1], with the
> addition of several fixes for PM regressions[2] across several
> platfo
Quoting Rajendra Nayak (2012-11-07 21:02:59)
> On Thursday 08 November 2012 06:42 AM, Mike Turquette wrote:
> > I also tested on OMAP4460 Panda-ES. Boot is fine and PRCM programming
> > appears sane. However Panda-ES never comes back from suspend/resume.
> > This problem exists on the PRM/CM bran
On Thursday 08 November 2012 06:42 AM, Mike Turquette wrote:
I also tested on OMAP4460 Panda-ES. Boot is fine and PRCM programming
appears sane. However Panda-ES never comes back from suspend/resume.
This problem exists on the PRM/CM branch I based on and was not
introduced by this series. I a
On Wed, 7 Nov 2012, Mike Turquette wrote:
> I believe Paul is planning on putting this series through his automated
> test rig.
Indeed and this is underway now.
- Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
Quoting Tony Lindgren (2012-11-07 17:42:18)
> Hi,
>
> * Mike Turquette [121107 17:33]:
> > Doh, I got the LAKML address wrong...
> >
> > Thankfully it's already up on some archives:
> > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.arm.omap/88824
> >
> > For anyone interested in testing:
> > git:/
Hi,
* Mike Turquette [121107 17:33]:
> Doh, I got the LAKML address wrong...
>
> Thankfully it's already up on some archives:
> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.arm.omap/88824
>
> For anyone interested in testing:
> git://git.linaro.org/people/mturquette/linux.git clk-omap-3.8
>
> Re
Doh, I got the LAKML address wrong...
Thankfully it's already up on some archives:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.arm.omap/88824
For anyone interested in testing:
git://git.linaro.org/people/mturquette/linux.git clk-omap-3.8
Regards,
Mike
Quoting Mike Turquette (2012-11-07 17:12:35)
From: Mike Turquette
Hi all,
This series is based on top of Paul's PRM/CM clean-up work. It is a
refresh of the patches Rajendra sent out a while back[1], with the
addition of several fixes for PM regressions[2] across several
platforms.
I have tested on OMAP4430 Panda including PRCM diffing a
16 matches
Mail list logo
