Hi Grant,
On 1/4/2012 7:12 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
On Fri, Dec 09, 2011 at 03:02:34PM +0100, Benoit Cousson wrote:
[...]
@@ -1183,22 +1187,53 @@ twl_probe(struct i2c_client *client, const struct
i2c_device_id *id)
int status;
unsigned
On Fri, Dec 09, 2011 at 03:02:34PM +0100, Benoit Cousson wrote:
> Add initial device-tree support for twl familly chips.
> The current version is missing the regulator entries due
> to the lack of DT regulator bindings for the moment.
> Only the simple sub-modules that do not depend on
> platform_d
Salut Samuel,
On 12/19/2011 1:03 PM, Samuel Ortiz wrote:
Hi Benoit,
On Fri, Dec 09, 2011 at 03:02:34PM +0100, Benoit Cousson wrote:
Add initial device-tree support for twl familly chips.
The current version is missing the regulator entries due
to the lack of DT regulator bindings for the momen
Hi Benoit,
On Fri, Dec 09, 2011 at 03:02:34PM +0100, Benoit Cousson wrote:
> Add initial device-tree support for twl familly chips.
> The current version is missing the regulator entries due
> to the lack of DT regulator bindings for the moment.
> Only the simple sub-modules that do not depend on
Add initial device-tree support for twl familly chips.
The current version is missing the regulator entries due
to the lack of DT regulator bindings for the moment.
Only the simple sub-modules that do not depend on
platform_data information can be initialized properly.
Add documentation for the Te