2010/8/4 Ohad Ben-Cohen o...@wizery.com:
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 2:41 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux
Why not arrange for a small piece of code to be built into the kernel
when this driver is selected as a module or built-in, which handles
the passing of platform data to the driver?
It's
On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 10:07 AM, Linus Walleij
linus.ml.wall...@gmail.com wrote:
2010/8/4 Ohad Ben-Cohen o...@wizery.com:
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 2:41 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux
Why not arrange for a small piece of code to be built into the kernel
when this driver is selected as a module or
On Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 01:02:24PM +0300, Ohad Ben-Cohen wrote:
We have Russell's suggestion which is nice and simple, but it has the
1 device limitation.
You could make it generic by doing something like this:
#define set_device_data(name, type, index, data)\
({
On Fri, 6 Aug 2010, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 01:02:24PM +0300, Ohad Ben-Cohen wrote:
We have Russell's suggestion which is nice and simple, but it has the
1 device limitation.
You could make it generic by doing something like this:
#define
Hi Vitaly,
On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 5:17 PM, Vitaly Wool vitalyw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 11:35 PM, Ohad Ben-Cohen o...@wizery.com wrote:
I'm honestly trying to understand your concerns, but I'm afraid that
just saying it's a hack is not too informative. Can you please
explain
On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 02:24:39PM +0300, Ohad Ben-Cohen wrote:
Hi Vitaly,
On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 5:17 PM, Vitaly Wool vitalyw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 11:35 PM, Ohad Ben-Cohen o...@wizery.com wrote:
I'm honestly trying to understand your concerns, but I'm afraid that
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 2:41 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux
li...@arm.linux.org.uk wrote:
On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 02:24:39PM +0300, Ohad Ben-Cohen wrote:
On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 5:17 PM, Vitaly Wool vitalyw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 11:35 PM, Ohad Ben-Cohen o...@wizery.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 2:42 PM, Ohad Ben-Cohen o...@wizery.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 2:41 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux
li...@arm.linux.org.uk wrote:
On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 02:24:39PM +0300, Ohad Ben-Cohen wrote:
On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 5:17 PM, Vitaly Wool vitalyw...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Ohad,
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 11:35 PM, Ohad Ben-Cohen o...@wizery.com wrote:
I'm honestly trying to understand your concerns, but I'm afraid that
just saying it's a hack is not too informative. Can you please
explain what do you think is technically wrong with the proposed
solution ? is
Hi Vitaly,
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 7:16 PM, Vitaly Wool vitalyw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 8:00 AM, Ohad Ben-Cohen o...@wizery.com wrote:
To my understanding, this data doesn't belong to mmc_host. It's not a
host data at all. E. g. imagine a GPIO IRQ for some SDIO chip -- it's
Hi Ohad,
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 5:54 PM, Ohad Ben-Cohen o...@wizery.com wrote:
SPI is using these spi_board_info tables to populate the SPI device
trees. These tables are registered early at the board-specific init
code, and are later used by SPI core to populate the devices when the
SPI
Hi Vitaly,
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 7:25 PM, Vitaly Wool vitalyw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 5:54 PM, Ohad Ben-Cohen o...@wizery.com wrote:
SPI is using these spi_board_info tables to populate the SPI device
trees. These tables are registered early at the board-specific init
Hi Vitaly,
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 10:47 PM, Vitaly Wool vitalyw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 7:33 PM, Ohad Ben-Cohen o...@wizery.com wrote:
Add support to set/get mmc_host private embedded
data.
This is needed to allow software to dynamically
create (and remove) SDIO
Hi Ohad,
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 8:00 AM, Ohad Ben-Cohen o...@wizery.com wrote:
To my understanding, this data doesn't belong to mmc_host. It's not a
host data at all. E. g. imagine a GPIO IRQ for some SDIO chip -- it's
totally unrelated to host.
I think a cleaner way would be to introduce
Hi Ohad,
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 7:33 PM, Ohad Ben-Cohen o...@wizery.com wrote:
Add support to set/get mmc_host private embedded
data.
This is needed to allow software to dynamically
create (and remove) SDIO functions which represents
embedded SDIO devices.
snip
@@ -209,6 +209,8 @@ struct
Add support to set/get mmc_host private embedded
data.
This is needed to allow software to dynamically
create (and remove) SDIO functions which represents
embedded SDIO devices.
Typically, it will be used to set the context of
a driver that is creating a new SDIO function
(and would then expect
16 matches
Mail list logo
