* Péter Ujfalusi [29 04:26]:
> On Thursday 10 November 2011 15:02:04 Jarkko Nikula wrote:
> > On 11/10/2011 02:46 PM, Jarkko Nikula wrote:
> > > On 11/07/2011 11:33 AM, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
> > >
> > > I think this is enough:
> > >
> > > if (unlikely(p->dma_read(CDAC, lch) == 0))
> > > offs
On Thursday 10 November 2011 15:02:04 Jarkko Nikula wrote:
> On 11/10/2011 02:46 PM, Jarkko Nikula wrote:
> > On 11/07/2011 11:33 AM, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
> >> If the DMA source position has been asked before the
> >> first actual data transfer has been done, the CSAC
> >> register does not contai
On 11/10/2011 02:46 PM, Jarkko Nikula wrote:
On 11/07/2011 11:33 AM, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
If the DMA source position has been asked before the
first actual data transfer has been done, the CSAC
register does not contain valid information.
We can identify this situation by checking the CDAC
regi
On 11/07/2011 11:33 AM, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
If the DMA source position has been asked before the
first actual data transfer has been done, the CSAC
register does not contain valid information.
We can identify this situation by checking the CDAC
register:
CDAC != 0 indicates that the DMA transfe
If the DMA source position has been asked before the
first actual data transfer has been done, the CSAC
register does not contain valid information.
We can identify this situation by checking the CDAC
register:
CDAC != 0 indicates that the DMA transfer on the channel has
been started already.
When