On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 4:40 AM, Stephen Warren swar...@wwwdotorg.org wrote:
Is this a public interface to the driver? If so, shouldn't the header be
in include/linux somewhere?
I think the split out of the public header is done in patch 2/2.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this
On Tue, Nov 06, 2012 at 09:55:52AM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 4:40 AM, Stephen Warren swar...@wwwdotorg.org wrote:
Is this a public interface to the driver? If so, shouldn't the header be
in include/linux somewhere?
I think the split out of the public header is
Hi Stephen,
On 5 November 2012 21:40, Stephen Warren swar...@wwwdotorg.org wrote:
On 11/05/2012 07:55 PM, Omar Ramirez Luna wrote:
Actually moving it from plat-omap, as this framework/driver code is
supposed to be under drivers/ folder. The framework should work with
the current supported
Hi Greg,
On 6 November 2012 02:59, Greg Kroah-Hartman gre...@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
On Tue, Nov 06, 2012 at 09:55:52AM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 4:40 AM, Stephen Warren swar...@wwwdotorg.org wrote:
Is this a public interface to the driver? If so, shouldn't the
On 11/05/2012 07:55 PM, Omar Ramirez Luna wrote:
Actually moving it from plat-omap, as this framework/driver code is
supposed to be under drivers/ folder. The framework should work with
the current supported OMAP processors (OMAP1+) that have mailbox and
can be used as a method of
