On 2015-01-10 14:34, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On 2015-01-09 17:40, Stefan Agner wrote:
>> Hi Marc,
>>
>> On 2015-01-07 18:42, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>>> IMX6 has been (ab)using the gic_arch_extn to provide
>>> wakeup from suspend, and it makes a lot of sense to convert
>>> this code to use stacked domain
On 2015-01-09 17:40, Stefan Agner wrote:
Hi Marc,
On 2015-01-07 18:42, Marc Zyngier wrote:
IMX6 has been (ab)using the gic_arch_extn to provide
wakeup from suspend, and it makes a lot of sense to convert
this code to use stacked domains instead.
This patch does just this, updating the DT files
Hi Marc,
On 2015-01-07 18:42, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> IMX6 has been (ab)using the gic_arch_extn to provide
> wakeup from suspend, and it makes a lot of sense to convert
> this code to use stacked domains instead.
>
> This patch does just this, updating the DT files to actually
> reflect what the HW
On 17:42-20150107, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> IMX6 has been (ab)using the gic_arch_extn to provide
> wakeup from suspend, and it makes a lot of sense to convert
> this code to use stacked domains instead.
>
> This patch does just this, updating the DT files to actually
> reflect what the HW provides.
>
IMX6 has been (ab)using the gic_arch_extn to provide
wakeup from suspend, and it makes a lot of sense to convert
this code to use stacked domains instead.
This patch does just this, updating the DT files to actually
reflect what the HW provides.
BIG FAT WARNING: because the DTs were so far lying