On 13/01/15 06:09, Linus Walleij wrote:
Hi Linus,
> On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 7:26 PM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>
>> IMX6 has been (ab)using the gic_arch_extn to provide
>> wakeup from suspend, and it makes a lot of sense to convert
>> this code to use stacked domains instead.
>>
>> This patch does ju
On 12/01/15 19:00, Stefan Agner wrote:
> Hi Marc,
>
> On 2015-01-12 19:26, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>> IMX6 has been (ab)using the gic_arch_extn to provide
>> wakeup from suspend, and it makes a lot of sense to convert
>> this code to use stacked domains instead.
>>
>> This patch does just this, updati
On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 7:26 PM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> IMX6 has been (ab)using the gic_arch_extn to provide
> wakeup from suspend, and it makes a lot of sense to convert
> this code to use stacked domains instead.
>
> This patch does just this, updating the DT files to actually
> reflect what the
Hi Marc,
On 2015-01-12 19:26, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> IMX6 has been (ab)using the gic_arch_extn to provide
> wakeup from suspend, and it makes a lot of sense to convert
> this code to use stacked domains instead.
>
> This patch does just this, updating the DT files to actually
> reflect what the HW
IMX6 has been (ab)using the gic_arch_extn to provide
wakeup from suspend, and it makes a lot of sense to convert
this code to use stacked domains instead.
This patch does just this, updating the DT files to actually
reflect what the HW provides.
BIG FAT WARNING: because the DTs were so far lying
