On Wednesday 11 March 2015 11:05:47 Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 10:51 AM, Arnd Bergmann a...@arndb.de wrote:
On Wednesday 11 March 2015 01:34:19 Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
+
+static struct wl12xx_platform_data *
+wlcore_get_platform_data(struct device
Hello Arnd,
On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 10:51 AM, Arnd Bergmann a...@arndb.de wrote:
On Wednesday 11 March 2015 01:34:19 Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
+
+static struct wl12xx_platform_data *
+wlcore_get_platform_data(struct device *dev)
+{
+ struct wl12xx_platform_data *pdata;
+
On Wednesday 11 March 2015 01:34:19 Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
+
+static struct wl12xx_platform_data *
+wlcore_get_platform_data(struct device *dev)
+{
+ struct wl12xx_platform_data *pdata;
+
+ /* first, look for DT data */
I thought it was the opposite, that
On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 11:51 AM, Arnd Bergmann a...@arndb.de wrote:
+static void wlcore_del_platform_data(struct wl12xx_platform_data *pdata)
+{
+ kfree(pdata);
+}
+
This function seems to be an unnecessary, why not just call kfree() directly?
Or better, maybe the
Hello Eliad,
On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 4:36 PM, Eliad Peller el...@wizery.com wrote:
When running with device-tree, we no longer have a board file
that can set up the platform data for wlcore.
Allow this data to be passed from DT.
For now, parse only the irq used. Other (optional) properties
When running with device-tree, we no longer have a board file
that can set up the platform data for wlcore.
Allow this data to be passed from DT.
For now, parse only the irq used. Other (optional) properties
can be added later on.
Signed-off-by: Ido Yariv i...@wizery.com
Signed-off-by: Eliad
On Monday 09 March 2015 17:36:41 Eliad Peller wrote:
@@ -323,11 +388,14 @@ out:
static void wl1271_remove(struct sdio_func *func)
{
struct wl12xx_sdio_glue *glue = sdio_get_drvdata(func);
+ struct wlcore_platdev_data *pdev_data = glue-core-dev.platform_data;
+ struct
