Hi Tony,
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 04:40:02, Tony Lindgren wrote:
* Tony Lindgren t...@atomide.com [120917 15:54]:
Can you please try with the attached patch ?
Gave it a quick try and it seemed to work.. But when I tried
rebasing my patches for the cbus to keep things working with
Hi Tony,
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 15:50:02, Mohammed, Afzal wrote:
* Mohammed, Afzal: Wednesday, September 12, 2012 3:20 PM
But some of the tusb async values is less by one. I need
to get it right.
Reason has been identified. It was due to rounding error,
no changes are required in the
* Mohammed, Afzal af...@ti.com [120917 01:40]:
Hi Tony,
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 15:50:02, Mohammed, Afzal wrote:
* Mohammed, Afzal: Wednesday, September 12, 2012 3:20 PM
But some of the tusb async values is less by one. I need
to get it right.
Reason has been identified. It was
* Tony Lindgren t...@atomide.com [120917 15:54]:
* Mohammed, Afzal af...@ti.com [120917 01:40]:
Hi Tony,
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 15:50:02, Mohammed, Afzal wrote:
* Mohammed, Afzal: Wednesday, September 12, 2012 3:20 PM
But some of the tusb async values is less by one. I need
* Mohammed, Afzal: Wednesday, September 12, 2012 3:20 PM
But some of the tusb async values is less by one. I need
to get it right.
Reason has been identified. It was due to rounding error,
no changes are required in the expressions. Moving
completely to picoseconds resolves the issue.
Can you
Hi Tony,
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 00:16:06, Tony Lindgren wrote:
Here are the timing changes with and without this patch from
my n800. You can just diff the two files to see some differences.
Hmm.. that was pretty close, OneNAND async,sync as well as
tusb sync values were same.
But some of
* Tony Lindgren t...@atomide.com [120906 13:45]:
* Mohammed, Afzal af...@ti.com [120906 00:40]:
Hi Tony,
On Mon, Sep 03, 2012 at 11:04:10, Mohammed, Afzal wrote:
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 14:04:44, Mohammed, Afzal wrote:
On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 01:16:30, Tony Lindgren wrote:
Hi Tony,
On Mon, Sep 03, 2012 at 11:04:10, Mohammed, Afzal wrote:
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 14:04:44, Mohammed, Afzal wrote:
On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 01:16:30, Tony Lindgren wrote:
This hangs n800 during the boot.
Paul reported that n800 stopped booting on OMAP baseline [1]
due to an mmc
* Mohammed, Afzal af...@ti.com [120906 00:40]:
Hi Tony,
On Mon, Sep 03, 2012 at 11:04:10, Mohammed, Afzal wrote:
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 14:04:44, Mohammed, Afzal wrote:
On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 01:16:30, Tony Lindgren wrote:
This hangs n800 during the boot.
Paul reported that
+ Rajendra
Hi
On Thu, 6 Sep 2012, Mohammed, Afzal wrote:
I tried to get an n800, but has been unsuccessful.
We took an n800 to TII a few years ago, hopefully you can find it. Cc'ing
Rajendra who might know where it is.
- Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe
Hi Tony,
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 14:04:44, Mohammed, Afzal wrote:
On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 01:16:30, Tony Lindgren wrote:
This hangs n800 during the boot.
Shall I read the above as n800 boot without patch 10/10,
but with the other patches in this series ?
As per the board file, n800 has
Hi Tony,
On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 01:16:30, Tony Lindgren wrote:
This hangs n800 during the boot.
Shall I read the above as n800 boot without patch 10/10,
but with the other patches in this series ?
As per the board file, n800 has tusb6010 as well as
OneNAND in sync read async write mode, was
* Afzal Mohammed af...@ti.com [120821 03:46]:
Generic gpmc timing calculation helper is available now, use
it instead of custom timing calculation.
This hangs n800 during the boot.
Tony
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-omap in
the body of a message to
Generic gpmc timing calculation helper is available now, use
it instead of custom timing calculation.
Signed-off-by: Afzal Mohammed af...@ti.com
---
arch/arm/mach-omap2/usb-tusb6010.c | 181 +---
1 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 138 deletions(-)
diff --git
14 matches
Mail list logo
