Re: [PATCH v7] OMAP2+: PM: omap device: API's for handling mstandby mode

2011-01-26 Thread Paul Walmsley
On Wed, 26 Jan 2011, G, Manjunath Kondaiah wrote: > On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 03:03:49PM +0530, G, Manjunath Kondaiah wrote: > > Paul/Benoit, > > > > On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 07:18:22AM +0530, G, Manjunath Kondaiah wrote: > > > Paul/Benoit, > > > > > > On Fri, Dec 03, 2010 at 01:19:06PM +0100, Cous

Re: [PATCH v7] OMAP2+: PM: omap device: API's for handling mstandby mode

2011-01-25 Thread G, Manjunath Kondaiah
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 03:03:49PM +0530, G, Manjunath Kondaiah wrote: > Paul/Benoit, > > On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 07:18:22AM +0530, G, Manjunath Kondaiah wrote: > > Paul/Benoit, > > > > On Fri, Dec 03, 2010 at 01:19:06PM +0100, Cousson, Benoit wrote: > > > On 12/3/2010 10:47 AM, G, Manjunath Kond

Re: [PATCH v7] OMAP2+: PM: omap device: API's for handling mstandby mode

2011-01-24 Thread G, Manjunath Kondaiah
Paul/Benoit, On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 07:18:22AM +0530, G, Manjunath Kondaiah wrote: > Paul/Benoit, > > On Fri, Dec 03, 2010 at 01:19:06PM +0100, Cousson, Benoit wrote: > > On 12/3/2010 10:47 AM, G, Manjunath Kondaiah wrote: > > >* Cousson, Benoit [2010-12-03 09:38:35 +0100]: > > > > [...] > >

Re: [PATCH v7] OMAP2+: PM: omap device: API's for handling mstandby mode

2010-12-13 Thread G, Manjunath Kondaiah
Paul/Benoit, On Fri, Dec 03, 2010 at 01:19:06PM +0100, Cousson, Benoit wrote: > On 12/3/2010 10:47 AM, G, Manjunath Kondaiah wrote: > >* Cousson, Benoit [2010-12-03 09:38:35 +0100]: > > [...] > > >>>v7: replaced mutex lock with spin lock. Added use count for controlling > >>>access to sysconfig

Re: [PATCH v7] OMAP2+: PM: omap device: API's for handling mstandby mode

2010-12-03 Thread Cousson, Benoit
On 12/3/2010 10:47 AM, G, Manjunath Kondaiah wrote: * Cousson, Benoit [2010-12-03 09:38:35 +0100]: [...] v7: replaced mutex lock with spin lock. Added use count for controlling access to sysconfig registers in case if overlapping request/release API's are used. I'm not sure it should be do

Re: [PATCH v7] OMAP2+: PM: omap device: API's for handling mstandby mode

2010-12-03 Thread G, Manjunath Kondaiah
* Cousson, Benoit [2010-12-03 09:38:35 +0100]: > On 12/2/2010 2:59 PM, G, Manjunath Kondaiah wrote: > >Certain errata in OMAP2+ processors will require forcing > >master standby to "no standby" mode before completing on going > >operation. Without this, the results will be unpredictable. > > > >S

Re: [PATCH v7] OMAP2+: PM: omap device: API's for handling mstandby mode

2010-12-03 Thread Cousson, Benoit
On 12/2/2010 2:59 PM, G, Manjunath Kondaiah wrote: Certain errata in OMAP2+ processors will require forcing master standby to "no standby" mode before completing on going operation. Without this, the results will be unpredictable. Since current implementation of PM run time framework does not su

Re: [PATCH v7] OMAP2+: PM: omap device: API's for handling mstandby mode

2010-12-02 Thread G, Manjunath Kondaiah
* G, Manjunath Kondaiah [2010-12-02 19:29:52 +0530]: > Certain errata in OMAP2+ processors will require forcing > master standby to "no standby" mode before completing on going > operation. Without this, the results will be unpredictable. > > Since current implementation of PM run time framewor

[PATCH v7] OMAP2+: PM: omap device: API's for handling mstandby mode

2010-12-02 Thread G, Manjunath Kondaiah
Certain errata in OMAP2+ processors will require forcing master standby to "no standby" mode before completing on going operation. Without this, the results will be unpredictable. Since current implementation of PM run time framework does not support changing sysconfig settings during middle of th