Re: [PATCHv11 0/6] I2C cleanups

2012-07-13 Thread Shubhrajyoti
On Thursday 12 July 2012 06:22 PM, Wolfram Sang wrote: On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 05:17:07PM +0530, Shubhrajyoti Datta wrote: On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 8:41 PM, Shubhrajyoti D shubhrajy...@ti.com wrote: This is a minimal cleanup series. If there are no further comments can this series be queued? I

Re: [PATCHv11 0/6] I2C cleanups

2012-07-12 Thread Wolfram Sang
On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 05:17:07PM +0530, Shubhrajyoti Datta wrote: On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 8:41 PM, Shubhrajyoti D shubhrajy...@ti.com wrote: This is a minimal cleanup series. If there are no further comments can this series be queued? I just applied a few of them. BTW I get a build

Re: [PATCHv11 0/6] I2C cleanups

2012-07-09 Thread Shubhrajyoti Datta
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 8:41 PM, Shubhrajyoti D shubhrajy...@ti.com wrote: This is a minimal cleanup series. If there are no further comments can this series be queued? The patch series does the following - Bus busy recovery mechanism. - Make the i2c use SET_RUNTIME_PM_OPS - Use

[PATCHv11 0/6] I2C cleanups

2012-06-28 Thread Shubhrajyoti D
This is a minimal cleanup series. The patch series does the following - Bus busy recovery mechanism. - Make the i2c use SET_RUNTIME_PM_OPS - Use INIT_COMPLETION instead of init_completion - the reset patch is dropped will try to rework it as per the review comments recieved. This applies on