On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 9:00 PM, Wolfram Sang w.s...@pengutronix.de wrote:
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 08:00:28PM +0530, Shubhrajyoti D wrote:
From: Felipe Balbi ba...@ti.com
stat BIT(1) is the same as BIT(1),
Not true. I'd guess you are missing some context in the patch
description.
See the
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 02:50:23PM +0530, Shubhrajyoti Datta wrote:
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 9:00 PM, Wolfram Sang w.s...@pengutronix.de wrote:
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 08:00:28PM +0530, Shubhrajyoti D wrote:
From: Felipe Balbi ba...@ti.com
stat BIT(1) is the same as BIT(1),
Not true.
From: Felipe Balbi ba...@ti.com
stat BIT(1) is the same as BIT(1), so let's
simplify things a bit by removing stat from
all omap_i2c_ack_stat() calls.
Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi ba...@ti.com
Reviewed-by : Santosh Shilimkar santosh.shilim...@ti.com
Signed-off-by: Shubhrajyoti D
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 08:00:28PM +0530, Shubhrajyoti D wrote:
From: Felipe Balbi ba...@ti.com
stat BIT(1) is the same as BIT(1),
Not true. I'd guess you are missing some context in the patch
description.
so let's
simplify things a bit by removing stat from
all omap_i2c_ack_stat()
