On Thu, Apr 01, 2010 at 11:29:16AM +0200, ext Grazvydas Ignotas wrote:
Hmh, dbck is shared by the whole GPIO bank, so what happens if someone
calls _set_gpio_debounce(bank, 1, 310) and then
_set_gpio_debounce(bank, 2, 0)? This should leave debounce enabled for
GPIO1, but you'll disable dbck on
On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 12:32 PM, Felipe Balbi felipe.ba...@nokia.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 01, 2010 at 11:29:16AM +0200, ext Grazvydas Ignotas wrote:
Hmh, dbck is shared by the whole GPIO bank, so what happens if someone
calls _set_gpio_debounce(bank, 1, 310) and then
_set_gpio_debounce(bank, 2,
On Thu, Apr 01, 2010 at 11:37:16AM +0200, ext Grazvydas Ignotas wrote:
On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 12:32 PM, Felipe Balbi felipe.ba...@nokia.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 01, 2010 at 11:29:16AM +0200, ext Grazvydas Ignotas wrote:
Hmh, dbck is shared by the whole GPIO bank, so what happens if someone
On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 1:10 PM, Felipe Balbi felipe.ba...@nokia.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 01, 2010 at 11:37:16AM +0200, ext Grazvydas Ignotas wrote:
On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 12:32 PM, Felipe Balbi felipe.ba...@nokia.com
wrote:
On Thu, Apr 01, 2010 at 11:29:16AM +0200, ext Grazvydas Ignotas wrote:
On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 12:32, Felipe Balbi felipe.ba...@nokia.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 01, 2010 at 11:29:16AM +0200, ext Grazvydas Ignotas wrote:
There is also an issue if somebody calls _set_gpio_debounce(bank, 1,
310) and _set_gpio_debounce(bank, 2, 620), the second call will
override
On Thu, Apr 01, 2010 at 04:11:27PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 12:32, Felipe Balbi felipe.ba...@nokia.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 01, 2010 at 11:29:16AM +0200, ext Grazvydas Ignotas wrote:
There is also an issue if somebody calls _set_gpio_debounce(bank, 1,
310) and
On Thu, Apr 01, 2010 at 07:42:50PM +0300, Felipe Balbi wrote:
On Thu, Apr 01, 2010 at 04:11:27PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
You might want to have a look at [1] on irq debouncing. The hardware
support for debouncing varies (bank/gpio restrictions, debounce
timeouts, no support at all, what
On Thu, 1 Apr 2010 19:15:08 +0100, Mark Brown
I tend to agree here, especially for GPIOs on slow buses like I2C or
which may be used as wake sources. I guess ideally we want something
like the LEDs do with blinking where we use the hardware feature if
present and suitable but fall back on
OMAP support debouncing of gpio lines, implement
the method using gpiolib.
Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi felipe.ba...@nokia.com
---
arch/arm/plat-omap/gpio.c | 68 +
1 files changed, 68 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 06:35:10PM +0300, Felipe Balbi wrote:
+ if (debounce) {
+ val |= l;
+ if (cpu_is_omap34xx() || cpu_is_omap44xx())
+ clk_enable(bank-dbck);
+ } else {
+ val = ~l;
+ if (cpu_is_omap34xx() ||
Hi,
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 06:21:58PM +0200, ext Mark Brown wrote:
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 06:35:10PM +0300, Felipe Balbi wrote:
+ if (debounce) {
+ val |= l;
+ if (cpu_is_omap34xx() || cpu_is_omap44xx())
+ clk_enable(bank-dbck);
+
Hi,
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 06:29:09PM +0200, Balbi Felipe (Nokia-D/Helsinki) wrote:
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 06:21:58PM +0200, ext Mark Brown wrote:
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 06:35:10PM +0300, Felipe Balbi wrote:
+ if (debounce) {
+ val |= l;
+ if
12 matches
Mail list logo
