Re: [RFC: PATCH] OMAP: hwmod: New API to modify the autoidle bits of sysconfig register

2010-09-03 Thread kishon
On Tuesday 31 August 2010 09:46 PM, Cousson, Benoit wrote: On 8/31/2010 4:41 PM, ABRAHAM, KISHON VIJAY wrote: On Tuesday 31 August 2010 01:43 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote: On Tue, 31 Aug 2010 10:53:36 +0530, kishona0393...@ti.comwrote: Though driver shouldn't be

Re: [RFC: PATCH] OMAP: hwmod: New API to modify the autoidle bits of sysconfig register

2010-08-31 Thread kishon
On Tuesday 31 August 2010 01:43 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote: On Tue, 31 Aug 2010 10:53:36 +0530, kishona0393...@ti.com wrote: Though driver shouldn't be using hwmod directly, there is no corresponding API in omap_device to do the same. So we are planning to store the omap_hwmod

Re: [RFC: PATCH] OMAP: hwmod: New API to modify the autoidle bits of sysconfig register

2010-08-31 Thread Cousson, Benoit
On 8/31/2010 4:41 PM, ABRAHAM, KISHON VIJAY wrote: On Tuesday 31 August 2010 01:43 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote: On Tue, 31 Aug 2010 10:53:36 +0530, kishona0393...@ti.com wrote: Though driver shouldn't be using hwmod directly, there is no corresponding API in omap_device to do the same.

Re: [RFC: PATCH] OMAP: hwmod: New API to modify the autoidle bits of sysconfig register

2010-08-30 Thread kishon
On Monday 30 August 2010 08:56 PM, Kevin Hilman wrote: Kishon Vijay Abraham Ikis...@ti.com writes: Though the sysconfig register values shouldn't be modified directly by the driver, MCBSP should be considered a special case where sysconfig registers need to be modified dynamically by