Felipe Balbi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 07:47:07AM +0200, ext Gadiyar, Anand wrote:
> >The differences between OMAP3 and OMAP4 are:
> >- The OMAP4 has a different set of clocks which do not exist
> on OMAP3.
> >- The register bits for configuring port modes is different
>
> is it a
Felipe Balbi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 07:47:07AM +0200, ext Gadiyar, Anand wrote:
> >The differences between OMAP3 and OMAP4 are:
> >- The OMAP4 has a different set of clocks which do not exist on OMAP3.
> >- The register bits for configuring port modes is different
>
> is it a di
el.org; linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: RE: [RFC] [PATCH 3/7] usb: ehci-omap: omap: Add OMAP4 support
>
> Felipe Balbi wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 01:49:33AM +0200, ext Keshava Munegowda wrote:
> > >@@ -298,7 +327,163 @@ static int omap_start_ehc(struct ehci_hc
&
Hi,
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 07:47:07AM +0200, ext Gadiyar, Anand wrote:
The differences between OMAP3 and OMAP4 are:
- The OMAP4 has a different set of clocks which do not exist on OMAP3.
- The register bits for configuring port modes is different
is it a different ip core or just a modificati
Felipe Balbi wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 01:49:33AM +0200, ext Keshava Munegowda wrote:
> >@@ -298,7 +327,163 @@ static int omap_start_ehc(struct ehci_hc
> > }
> >
> > if (cpu_is_omap44xx()) {
> >-/* TODO */
>
> driver should never make use of cpu_is_omap* calls neither ma
Hi,
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 01:49:33AM +0200, ext Keshava Munegowda wrote:
@@ -298,7 +327,163 @@ static int omap_start_ehc(struct ehci_hc
}
if (cpu_is_omap44xx()) {
- /* TODO */
driver should never make use of cpu_is_omap* calls neither machine_is_*
for that mat
Update the ehci-omap driver to add support for OMAP4.
The OMAP4 has two ports compared to 3 on the OMAP3.
Each port has its own functional clock, compared to a single clock
for all ports on OMAP3. The clock can be internally sourced
(TLL mode, HSIC mode), or externally provided (ULPI PHY).
Regis
