Tony Lindgren t...@atomide.com writes:
* Kevin Hilman khil...@deeprootsystems.com [121012 13:34]:
I'm not conviced (yet) that a mismatch is the root cause. Yes, that's
what the author of $SUBJECT patch assumed and stated, but I'm not
pursuaded.
If it's an improperly configured mux
Hi Paul,
There are
On Thursday 11 October 2012 11:58 PM, Paul Walmsley wrote:
Hi Sourav, Felipe,
any progress on fixing the N800 problem? Would be good to keep it booting
since we use it as our primary 2420 test platform.
- Paul
The patch sent inlined below might help us to get rid of the
Sourav sourav.pod...@ti.com writes:
Hi Paul,
There are
On Thursday 11 October 2012 11:58 PM, Paul Walmsley wrote:
Hi Sourav, Felipe,
any progress on fixing the N800 problem? Would be good to keep it booting
since we use it as our primary 2420 test platform.
- Paul
The patch sent
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 09:35:54AM -0700, Kevin Hilman wrote:
Sourav sourav.pod...@ti.com writes:
diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/omap-serial.c
b/drivers/tty/serial/omap-serial.c
index 6ede6fd..3fbc7f7 100644
--- a/drivers/tty/serial/omap-serial.c
+++ b/drivers/tty/serial/omap-serial.c
; Shilimkar, Santosh;
linux-ser...@vger.kernel.org; linux-omap@vger.kernel.org;
linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org; a...@linux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [RFT/PATCH] serial: omap: prevent resume if device is not
suspended.
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 09:35:54AM -0700, Kevin Hilman wrote:
Sourav sourav.pod
Russell King - ARM Linux li...@arm.linux.org.uk writes:
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 09:35:54AM -0700, Kevin Hilman wrote:
Sourav sourav.pod...@ti.com writes:
diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/omap-serial.c
b/drivers/tty/serial/omap-serial.c
index 6ede6fd..3fbc7f7 100644
---
...@linuxfoundation.org;
t...@atomide.com; linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org; Shilimkar, Santosh;
linux-ser...@vger.kernel.org; linux-omap@vger.kernel.org;
linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org; a...@linux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [RFT/PATCH] serial: omap: prevent resume if device is not
suspended
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 10:59:22AM -0700, Kevin Hilman wrote:
Russell King - ARM Linux li...@arm.linux.org.uk writes:
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 09:35:54AM -0700, Kevin Hilman wrote:
Sourav sourav.pod...@ti.com writes:
diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/omap-serial.c
Russell King - ARM Linux li...@arm.linux.org.uk writes:
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 10:59:22AM -0700, Kevin Hilman wrote:
Russell King - ARM Linux li...@arm.linux.org.uk writes:
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 09:35:54AM -0700, Kevin Hilman wrote:
Sourav sourav.pod...@ti.com writes:
diff --git
* Kevin Hilman khil...@deeprootsystems.com [121012 13:34]:
I'm not conviced (yet) that a mismatch is the root cause. Yes, that's
what the author of $SUBJECT patch assumed and stated, but I'm not
pursuaded.
If it's an improperly configured mux issue, then the UART will break
whenever the
Hi Sourav, Felipe,
any progress on fixing the N800 problem? Would be good to keep it booting
since we use it as our primary 2420 test platform.
- Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-omap in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo
Poddar, Sourav sourav.pod...@ti.com writes:
Hi,
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 2:51 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux
li...@arm.linux.org.uk wrote:
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 12:11:14PM +0300, Felipe Balbi wrote:
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 10:12:28AM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Tue, Sep 25,
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 01:52:03PM +0530, Poddar, Sourav wrote:
Hi Greg,
Ping on this?
It was a RFT patch, with a huge thread. What's the resolution here?
Did people figure out the real problem here or not? If so, care to
resend the proper patch so I know what to apply?
thanks,
greg k-h
Hi Greg,
Ping on this?
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 6:10 PM, Sourav Poddar sourav.pod...@ti.com wrote:
Greg's tty-next is not booting on 2420 based N800. The failure is
observed at serial init itself. The reason might be that n800 tries to
resume even though it is not suspended before.
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 01:52:03PM +0530, Poddar, Sourav wrote:
Hi Greg,
Ping on this?
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 6:10 PM, Sourav Poddar sourav.pod...@ti.com wrote:
Greg's tty-next is not booting on 2420 based N800. The failure is
observed at serial init itself. The reason might be that
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 09:30:29AM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 01:52:03PM +0530, Poddar, Sourav wrote:
Hi Greg,
Ping on this?
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 6:10 PM, Sourav Poddar sourav.pod...@ti.com wrote:
Greg's tty-next is not booting on 2420 based
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 11:31:20AM +0300, Felipe Balbi wrote:
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 09:30:29AM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
How is this happening? I think that needs proper investigation - or if
it's had more investigation, then the results needs to be included in
the commit
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 10:12:28AM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 11:31:20AM +0300, Felipe Balbi wrote:
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 09:30:29AM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
How is this happening? I think that needs proper investigation - or if
it's
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 12:11:14PM +0300, Felipe Balbi wrote:
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 10:12:28AM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 11:31:20AM +0300, Felipe Balbi wrote:
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 09:30:29AM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
How is this
Hi,
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 10:21:18AM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 12:11:14PM +0300, Felipe Balbi wrote:
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 10:12:28AM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 11:31:20AM +0300, Felipe Balbi wrote:
On Tue, Sep
Hi,
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 2:51 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux
li...@arm.linux.org.uk wrote:
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 12:11:14PM +0300, Felipe Balbi wrote:
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 10:12:28AM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 11:31:20AM +0300, Felipe Balbi wrote:
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 12:48:16PM +0300, Felipe Balbi wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 10:21:18AM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 12:11:14PM +0300, Felipe Balbi wrote:
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 10:12:28AM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Tue,
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 11:29:58AM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 12:48:16PM +0300, Felipe Balbi wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 10:21:18AM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 12:11:14PM +0300, Felipe Balbi wrote:
On Tue,
Right, let's get this thread back onto a constructive footing and try
to understand the problems here.
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 03:26:06PM +0530, Poddar, Sourav wrote:
The issue was observed at serial init itself in the N800 board and the
log does not show up much.
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 01:37:03PM +0300, Felipe Balbi wrote:
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 11:29:58AM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
Because you are accusing me of potentially breaking your beagleboard
for merely suggesting further investigation and a better commit message.
Where did I
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 12:11:14PM +0300, Felipe Balbi wrote:
that's most likely, of course. But should we cause a regression to
beagleboard XM because of that ? Also, if you look into chapter 9 of the
runtime_pm documentation, starting on line 822 you'll see documentation
suggests the use of
Hi,
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 12:07:03PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 01:37:03PM +0300, Felipe Balbi wrote:
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 11:29:58AM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
Because you are accusing me of potentially breaking your beagleboard
for
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 02:12:43PM +0300, Felipe Balbi wrote:
I don't see any aggressive attitude towards what you suggested,
actually. Mailing list archives are available to check, but the one
cursing around was always yourself and THAT deserves an apology.
Total rubbish. No apology, because
On 19 September 2012 17:29, Felipe Balbi ba...@ti.com wrote:
this is what I mean, actually. If we remove pm_runtime_get_sync() in
exchange for pm_runtime_set_active() before pm_runtime_enable(), it
works on PandaBoard, but breaks BeagleBoard.
Perhaps it suggests that OMAP4 (PandaBoard) serial
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 5:02 PM, Felipe Balbi ba...@ti.com wrote:
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 06:10:50PM +0530, Sourav Poddar wrote:
Greg's tty-next is not booting on 2420 based N800. The failure is
observed at serial init itself. The reason might be that n800 tries to
resume even though it is not
Greg's tty-next is not booting on 2420 based N800. The failure is
observed at serial init itself. The reason might be that n800 tries to
resume even though it is not suspended before.
Reported-by: Paul Walmsley p...@pwsan.com
Signed-off-by: Sourav Poddar sourav.pod...@ti.com
---
This patch is
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 06:10:50PM +0530, Sourav Poddar wrote:
Greg's tty-next is not booting on 2420 based N800. The failure is
observed at serial init itself. The reason might be that n800 tries to
resume even though it is not suspended before.
Reported-by: Paul Walmsley p...@pwsan.com
On Tue, 18 Sep 2012, Felipe Balbi wrote:
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 06:10:50PM +0530, Sourav Poddar wrote:
Greg's tty-next is not booting on 2420 based N800. The failure is
observed at serial init itself. The reason might be that n800 tries to
resume even though it is not suspended before.
33 matches
Mail list logo
