On May 27, 2009, at 2:59 PM, Dirk Behme wrote:
Blazej Kot wrote:
Thanks for that, it is an interesting link. I have now reached the
new low of around 170mW (at 3.28V), but this is high. I basically
used the TWL (PMC) scripts in the linked post, and also turned off
the U6 chip on the gum
Blazej Kot wrote:
On May 20, 2009, at 1:55 PM, Kevin Hilman wrote:
Kevin Hilman writes:
Blazej Kot writes:
I have been working with the linux-pm kernel on the Gumstix Overo,
seeing how low it's power consumption can go, both during the cpu "on"
and especially while the CPU is suspended.
On May 20, 2009, at 1:55 PM, Kevin Hilman wrote:
Kevin Hilman writes:
Blazej Kot writes:
I have been working with the linux-pm kernel on the Gumstix Overo,
seeing how low it's power consumption can go, both during the cpu
"on"
and especially while the CPU is suspended. Thus far, I've h
Kevin Hilman writes:
> Blazej Kot writes:
>
>> I have been working with the linux-pm kernel on the Gumstix Overo,
>> seeing how low it's power consumption can go, both during the cpu "on"
>> and especially while the CPU is suspended. Thus far, I've had some
>> disappointing results, the best I c
Blazej Kot writes:
> I have been working with the linux-pm kernel on the Gumstix Overo,
> seeing how low it's power consumption can go, both during the cpu "on"
> and especially while the CPU is suspended. Thus far, I've had some
> disappointing results, the best I could get is about 500mW while
Hi,
I have been working with the linux-pm kernel on the Gumstix Overo,
seeing how low it's power consumption can go, both during the cpu "on"
and especially while the CPU is suspended. Thus far, I've had some
disappointing results, the best I could get is about 500mW while on,
and 250mW w
