On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 2:59 AM, Mark Brown
broo...@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com wrote:
On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 10:00:55PM +0200, Felipe Contreras wrote:
On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 11:54 PM, Mark Brown
On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 11:51:11PM +0200, Felipe Contreras wrote:
That should not be
On Mon, Jan 02, 2012 at 08:33:03PM +0200, Felipe Contreras wrote:
On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 2:59 AM, Mark Brown
Which is relevant because...? To repeat, the ordering of module loading
is totally ortogonal as any ordering of modules is supported. You
appear to be totally ignoring what I am
Felipe Contreras felipe.contre...@gmail.com writes:
On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 2:59 AM, Mark Brown
broo...@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com wrote:
On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 10:00:55PM +0200, Felipe Contreras wrote:
On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 11:54 PM, Mark Brown
On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 11:51:11PM +0200,
On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 10:22:31PM +, M?ns Rullg?rd wrote:
Mark Brown broo...@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com writes:
The reason the driver is not loaded automatically is that the OMAP
machine drivers have not been converted to platform devices.
I posted patches doing the conversion a long
On 12/30/2011 12:52 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 10:22:31PM +, M?ns Rullg?rd wrote:
Mark Brownbroo...@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com writes:
The reason the driver is not loaded automatically is that the OMAP
machine drivers have not been converted to platform devices.
I
Mark Brown broo...@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com writes:
On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 10:22:31PM +, M?ns Rullg?rd wrote:
Mark Brown broo...@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com writes:
The reason the driver is not loaded automatically is that the OMAP
machine drivers have not been converted to
Måns Rullgård m...@mansr.com writes:
Mark Brown broo...@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com writes:
On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 10:22:31PM +, M?ns Rullg?rd wrote:
Mark Brown broo...@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com writes:
The reason the driver is not loaded automatically is that the OMAP
machine
On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 11:54 PM, Mark Brown
broo...@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com wrote:
On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 11:51:11PM +0200, Felipe Contreras wrote:
On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 11:27 PM, Mark Brown
On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 11:25:50PM +0200, Felipe Contreras wrote:
On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at
On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 10:00:55PM +0200, Felipe Contreras wrote:
On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 11:54 PM, Mark Brown
On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 11:51:11PM +0200, Felipe Contreras wrote:
That should not be required, the modules should be loadable in any
order.
Yes, but udev loads
On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 07:34:29PM +, Måns Rullgård wrote:
Måns Rullgård m...@mansr.com writes:
In which tree? I haven't seen anything of the kind.
The random sampling of drivers I looked at seemed to be doing something
sensible.
That would be this one:
On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 05:59:57PM +0200, Felipe Contreras wrote:
It was not working for me, but it seems the problem was related to
mdev/udev; snd_soc_tlv320aic3x has to be loaded before snd-soc-rx51.
That should not be required, the modules should be loadable in any
order.
--
To unsubscribe
On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 8:37 PM, Mark Brown
broo...@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com wrote:
On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 05:59:57PM +0200, Felipe Contreras wrote:
It was not working for me, but it seems the problem was related to
mdev/udev; snd_soc_tlv320aic3x has to be loaded before snd-soc-rx51.
On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 11:25:50PM +0200, Felipe Contreras wrote:
On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 8:37 PM, Mark Brown
On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 05:59:57PM +0200, Felipe Contreras wrote:
It was not working for me, but it seems the problem was related to
mdev/udev; snd_soc_tlv320aic3x has to be loaded
On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 11:27 PM, Mark Brown
broo...@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com wrote:
On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 11:25:50PM +0200, Felipe Contreras wrote:
On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 8:37 PM, Mark Brown
On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 05:59:57PM +0200, Felipe Contreras wrote:
It was not working for me,
On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 11:51:11PM +0200, Felipe Contreras wrote:
On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 11:27 PM, Mark Brown
On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 11:25:50PM +0200, Felipe Contreras wrote:
On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 8:37 PM, Mark Brown
On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 05:59:57PM +0200, Felipe Contreras wrote:
Mark Brown broo...@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com writes:
On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 11:51:11PM +0200, Felipe Contreras wrote:
On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 11:27 PM, Mark Brown
On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 11:25:50PM +0200, Felipe Contreras wrote:
On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 8:37 PM, Mark Brown
On Sat, Dec
Hi Felipe,
Using RX51 audio as module works on 3.1 mainline kernel after loading
the following modules:
$ modprobe snd-soc-rx51
$ modprobe snd-soc-omap
-- Sebastian
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 10:27 AM, Sebastian Reichel s...@debian.org wrote:
Using RX51 audio as module works on 3.1 mainline kernel after loading
the following modules:
$ modprobe snd-soc-rx51
$ modprobe snd-soc-omap
It was not working for me, but it seems the problem was related to
Hi,
Pretty much $subject. Any ideas about why?
# cat /proc/asound/cards
--- no soundcards ---
There's no error message or anything, and rx51_soc_init() exists properly.
Cheers.
--
Felipe Contreras
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-omap in
the body of a message
19 matches
Mail list logo
