* Felipe Balbi [EMAIL PROTECTED] [080723 13:13]:
On Wed, 23 Jul 2008 12:38:49 +0300, Riku Voipio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Indeed - compared to my previous version, this one makes the boardfile
even smaller:
textdata bss dec hex filename
23621552 4
On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 09:20:46AM -0500, Felipe Balbi wrote:
On Tue, 22 Jul 2008 14:43:14 +0100, Ben Dooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Split them into a common and then machine specfic structures, you are
allowed to register more than one board per bus.
Good to know :-)
Indeed - compared to
On Tue, 22 Jul 2008 15:47:43 +0300, Riku Voipio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hmm. I think it would be better to avoid calling the probe
in first place. git diff made the attached patch look more
confusing than it actually is. Personally I'd eliminate
all ifdefs from those i2c_board_info
Subject: [PATCH] input: add more error checks to lm8323 driver
If we can't reach the driver, we stop trying to probe
it. Useful when building kernel for n800 and n810.
n800 doesn't have lm8323, so that driver shouldn't probe
there.
Hmm. I think it would be better to avoid calling the probe
On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 07:52:44AM -0500, Felipe Balbi wrote:
On Tue, 22 Jul 2008 15:47:43 +0300, Riku Voipio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hmm. I think it would be better to avoid calling the probe
in first place. git diff made the attached patch look more
confusing than it actually is.
On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 04:37:42PM +0300, Riku Voipio wrote:
On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 07:52:44AM -0500, Felipe Balbi wrote:
On Tue, 22 Jul 2008 15:47:43 +0300, Riku Voipio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hmm. I think it would be better to avoid calling the probe
in first place. git diff made
Hi,
On Tue, 22 Jul 2008 14:43:14 +0100, Ben Dooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Split them into a common and then machine specfic structures, you are
allowed to register more than one board per bus.
Good to know :-)
Riku, could you update your patch then ?
but it anyways doesn't annul the need of
Hello all,
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 09:25:06PM -0600, ext Paul Walmsley wrote:
noticed a few issues booting the N800 with the current git head
d3b3ae0fe6c71641da19c8de466ec366d39847e3 today. Haven't booted the N800
for a while, so not sure when these showed up.
Looks like there is some
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 09:25:06PM -0600, ext Paul Walmsley wrote:
noticed a few issues booting the N800 with the current git head
d3b3ae0fe6c71641da19c8de466ec366d39847e3 today. Haven't booted the N800
for a while, so not sure when these showed up.
Can you reproduce it, I just botted n800
On Fri, 18 Jul 2008, Felipe Balbi wrote:
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 09:25:06PM -0600, ext Paul Walmsley wrote:
noticed a few issues booting the N800 with the current git head
d3b3ae0fe6c71641da19c8de466ec366d39847e3 today. Haven't booted the N800
for a while, so not sure when these showed
On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 02:49:45AM -0600, ext Paul Walmsley wrote:
It boots to desktop, but those messages come across the serial console
consistently across several boots. Do touchscreen taps play sound for
you?
Hmm, now I got it right.
The thing is that n800 doesn't have lm8323 (keypad),
On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 02:49:45AM -0600, ext Paul Walmsley wrote:
Kai, does MMC on N800 use the on-chip controller, or a controller on I2C?
If I remember right it uses internal controller but the voltage has to
be set for each slot from Menelaus and Menelaus is controlled by i2c.
Cheers,
On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 02:49:45AM -0600, ext Paul Walmsley wrote:
It boots to desktop, but those messages come across the serial console
consistently across several boots. Do touchscreen taps play sound for
you?
The attached patch fixes lm8323 error. I'll see the others now.
--
balbi
Hello everyone,
noticed a few issues booting the N800 with the current git head
d3b3ae0fe6c71641da19c8de466ec366d39847e3 today. Haven't booted the N800
for a while, so not sure when these showed up.
Looks like there is some LM8323 problem - suppose it could be an I2C
problem:
[4.384094]
14 matches
Mail list logo
