On Wed, 1 Feb 2012, NeilBrown wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Jan 2012 23:02:51 -0700 (MST) Paul Walmsley wrote:
>
> > Since the HDQ module doesn't support the idle protocol, the target clock
> > FSM in the CM is what should determine whether the module is considered
> > idle or not. And as long as the b
On Fri, 27 Jan 2012 23:02:51 -0700 (MST) Paul Walmsley wrote:
> Since the HDQ module doesn't support the idle protocol, the target clock
> FSM in the CM is what should determine whether the module is considered
> idle or not. And as long as the bit in the CM_FCLKEN register
> corresponding t
On Sat, 28 Jan 2012, NeilBrown wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Jan 2012 15:58:40 -0700 (MST) Paul Walmsley wrote:
>
> > Hmm, okay. Could you please remove the register read from the HDQ probe
> > and see if that makes a difference?
>
> So with 'kzalloc' in place of 'kmalloc' where hdq_data is allocated,
On Fri, 27 Jan 2012 15:58:40 -0700 (MST) Paul Walmsley wrote:
> On Sat, 28 Jan 2012, NeilBrown wrote:
> > > Here's a theory: perhaps the MPU powerdomain is hitting a low-power state
> > > while waiting for an HDQ interrupt. When the MPU powerdomain is in a low
> > > power state, so is the MPU
On Sat, 28 Jan 2012, NeilBrown wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Jan 2012 07:19:19 -0700 (MST) Paul Walmsley wrote:
>
> > Thanks. Should I add a Tested-by: from you on those patches?
>
> Well... I only tested them after backporting to 3.2, and Linus is a big
> proponent of the idea that once you rebase patch
On Thu, 26 Jan 2012 07:19:19 -0700 (MST) Paul Walmsley wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Jan 2012, NeilBrown wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 21 Jan 2012 17:07:18 -0700 (MST) Paul Walmsley
> > wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, 18 Jan 2012, NeilBrown wrote:
> > >
> > > > Oh - another thing.
> > > > Sometimes during early boot
On Tue, 24 Jan 2012, NeilBrown wrote:
> On Sat, 21 Jan 2012 17:07:18 -0700 (MST) Paul Walmsley wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 18 Jan 2012, NeilBrown wrote:
> >
> > > Oh - another thing.
> > > Sometimes during early boot I get:
> > >
> > > [0.158447] omap_hwmod: usbtll_fck: missing clockdomain for us
On Sat, 21 Jan 2012 17:07:18 -0700 (MST) Paul Walmsley wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Jan 2012, NeilBrown wrote:
>
> > Oh - another thing.
> > Sometimes during early boot I get:
> >
> > [0.158447] omap_hwmod: usbtll_fck: missing clockdomain for usbtll_fck.
> > [0.176879] omap_hwmod: hdq: softreset
